SEO extraordinaire Dee Barizo discusses the topic of long-term linkbuilding and how you should focus on the sort of links that will most likely still be relevant in the future.
Following on a video posted by Rand at SEOMoz, Dee suggests that the best way to answer this question is to focus on “links which would exist even if Google wasn’t around.”
Personally, I think that there is a major flaw in this line of thinking. It assumes that there is a definite answer to the question “Which links would exist even if Google wasn’t around?”
In asking this question, we’re supposed to answer a counterfactual that *just doesn’t match reality* – Google does exist, and Google’s existence colors the environment in which links exist.
Rather than focus on the sort of links that might exist even if Google wasn’t around (which asks us to build links as if we were in some alternative universe) I think that Dee’s answer to the question “What are the sort of links that will still be relevant in the future” is best found in another post that he made entitled The Value of a Balanced Link Portfolio.
You want a simple answer to an eminently important question? Here it is: if you want links that will count in the future, then focus on building a stable, balanced portfolio. Don’t use just one single strategy.
So really you just two need things: 1) links that will still be there in the future and 2) links from a variety of sources (directories, blog comments, blog posts, article posts, run of site sidebar, etc.)
One more principle: not all links need to be niche-relevant, but at least 60% of your links should be.
So let’s sum it up. For long term linkbuilding, it’s pretty straight forwad:
1. You want links that stand a fighting chance of still being there 12 months from now
2. You want links from a variety of sources, 60-80% of which are niche-relevant.