Reading about what’s coming in Firefox 2, makes me think that we may want to brainstorm a bit on what performancing might do to stay ahead of the curve on XUL development.
Thoughts?
powered by performancing firefox
Reading about what’s coming in Firefox 2, makes me think that we may want to brainstorm a bit on what performancing might do to stay ahead of the curve on XUL development.
Thoughts?
powered by performancing firefox
Has anyone else noticed recent launches do not seem to have created the buzz they might have once before? Is it possible that the web has come down with a bad case of “launch fatigue”?
At one time all you had to do was get a few well-placed mentions and you could ride the rollercoaster of IPO all the way to the bank. Now it seems much-boosted web2.0 launches, even with big money backing and brown paper envelopes well deployed in all the right bloggers pockets, do not seem to have made anything near the usual impact.
Take Sphere for instance. Have you even heard of it? Techcrunch have given them air-time, Time.com are in bed with them in a significant way, supposedly it makes up where Technorati leaves off.
If that is the case, why is nobody I know using it? Have you done any Sphere searches?
Actually do try it out, it’s not bad. I don’t mean to single out Sphere as I am sure they are doing good work. Just it seems good work, a bribed blogger or two and venture capital are not enough now.
This might hint at a larger issue that the web now is truly resisting the “broadcast” approach. Superbowl ads are just not the ticket now for launching a web service. We have talked many times before about word of mouth being the best form of advertising, and permission marketing being the most effective way of informing your customers while retaining loyalty. Perhaps we are seeing the evidence of this now.
There is little chance that we have gotten everything right but I am glad our launches were done the way we did them. Building an audience, working out what they need then trying your best to give it them, while tweaking as you go. Seems the right approach to me. At least this way we succeed or fail on what we do rather than what people are saying about us
powered by performancing firefox
I was just pointed to a nice glossary of web design terms. Old hands might find they know everything in there (you might be surprised) but they do take suggestions if there is something they have missed.
Rather than just have the term and a definition they have obviously worked hard to provide enough detail to be truly useful, with proper explanations that really describe the meaning. Where the source of the material is from outside they do give credit, only time will tell how much of it is original as surely the originator will come looking!
I have never heard of “Motive” before but now I can guarantee a lot more people now have this New Zealand web firm on their radar, if anything this shows how with a little bit of work you can get some great attention and links without having to go begging or spamming.
Have a think if your niche could do with something similar …
powered by performancing firefox
“Give them what they want”. For blogs that translates to “write content that people want to read”. Easier said than done, right? How do you know what “they” want, are you meant to be psychic? There are a few ways of working out what is popular right now:
What would happen though if you only posted about what was already popular? A pretty bland blog where everyone who reads it ends up sounding like a frog; “read it, read it, read it”. The only idea out of that list that is not based on cribbing other peoples posts is number 6, but if you keep writing the same old stuff people will soon become bored.
So you have to look outside of what is already popular. For sure use those services listed above and do those things, but the aim should be to uncover previously less known shiny hidden nuggets rather than strip-mining the top 10 most popular links. You can guarantee BoingBoing and hundreds of other blogs already got there first. Your readers are coming to you for something different, something unique and special to you.
Hmmm, how do you manage “unique“?
Many writers suggest you should write for yourself. You can not please everybody so you are better off writing to your own taste and hope that enough people think the same way that your content is well received. There is a lot to be said for this tactic and as an everyday rule of thumb I guess it mostly works. Every now and then though something will come along and cause you to question that line of thinking.
On my photography blog I feel pretty tuned-in to the camera-geek audience, I am after all a fully paid up lifetime member of the photo nerd club. Darren Rowse though showed perhaps I am not so tuned in after all. He posted an innocent little post about how to hold a camera. I didn’t link to it, in fact I nearly snorted my cornflakes across the room when I saw it thinking it was downright hilarious that he wrote it. What a fool I was, I see that little post generated what he describes as a traffic tsunami. What I took as insultingly basic worked out to be a massive success for his brand new blog, he touched on a topic people absolutely wanted to read and link to.
So if looking to what is already popular doesn’t work, nobody else was writing about how to hold a camera after all, and writing for yourself also doesn’t work, what is left?
Well I would say don’t dismiss keeping an ear to the ground for what is popular, it will inform your thinking and a small amount of linking to stuff people have already seen is fine providing you can put your own unique commentary or spin on the theme. Also I would say your own feelings and tastes are a good barometer for what is right or wrong on your blog. Your audience though is who you write for, you need to see things from their perspective.
There are two techniques for getting into your audiences heads; empathise or ask.
Asking is the obvious one. Simply approach readers individually, in a post, do a survey/questionnaire/poll, etc. The method is not as important as the results. Also approach people in your target audience who are not already readers. These will be in real life or in forums related to the niche. You have to remember though that what you ask and how you ask it are very important, do not ask questions that lead your interviewee to answer a certain way and do not presume you know the answer before asking it. Sadly also don’t expect the answers you get back to be entirely honest or accurate. Too many focus groups have jaded me to thinking people are very vulnerable to the herd instinct. Again your gut will have to be your guide.
Finally we are left with empathising. Empathy is in part reliant on all of the above. You are feeding your subconscious mind with as much information you possibly can for it to stew on and hopefully ferment up the perfect picture of your gestalt reader. For many blogs there will not be just one type of reader, you will have newbies, old hands, experts, trolls, hobbyists, pros, socialisers, just-the-facts … you need to cater for who you think are important and work out what motivates each one. Some will not be your audience, they will have just parachuted in from a search engine and will never be seen again, working out your loyal core is increasingly important.
Many people find it useful to create a pen portrait or “profiles” of their most important “typical” reader(s):
By building up this picture you can work out where you are serving your audience and where you are failing. You can also generate ideas for attracting more of them.
This sounds like hard work. You might be thinking “people seem to like my blog already, I don’t need to do this”. It is surprising how effective spending a little time trying to get into your audience heads can be. Look at how popular our firefox extension was, it blew us away as we thought it would be a nice little download but never as interesting as people found it. When you hit the spot it really pays off.
You have to remember you are not your audience, you only get really successful not when you entertain yourself but when you are interesting to your readers. The keys to this are locked in your audiences heads and you need to work to reveal them.
powered by performancing firefox
Funny, contradictory, and contraversial. Just what I needed this evening.
#33 was my favorite: “Have relevant ads that are even better than your content.” Cos really, the state of blog advertising sucks.
powered by performancing firefox
Whilst out and about on my travels a couple of days ago, I happened across a blog that had had an article syndicated on a favorite read of mine, and wanted to email the author rather than comment. I spent nearly 10 minutes scouring the page for a simple contact link or form. I waded through heaps and heaps of useless digital trash in the hope of being able to contact the author and ended up giving up.
To make a point, let me share with you what I had to traverse in the sidebar whilst squinting at the tiny fonts for a link:
On revisiting the blog today to write this post, i actually found the contact link. It was hiding in a graphical button, naturally. God forbid it should be a blue underlined link in a prominent location..
powered by performancing firefox
As we’ve talked about before, the next version of Performancing for Firefox is just around the corner.
Originally it was going to be a quick release to add Arabic Localization, Right-to-Left (RTL) support and the Publishing options bug fix, however we have decided to go a bit farther for this release.
New in the upcoming release:
As Nick recently mentioned we are looking for translating partners so that this next version of PFF can reach a larger group of users in their own language.
Specifically if you know of, or work with a non-english Blogging community that would be interested in promoting PFF and assisting with the translation, send them our way. Even if you don’t, individual translators are welcome and encouraged to sign up and help out.
We are aiming to finalize the UI strings by the end of the weekend so leave a comment, or PM me if you are interested.
The Current Localization Teams Are:
Romanian
Portugese
Dutch
Italian
French
German
Spanish
Chinese
Turkish
Arabic
As you can see, there are still plenty of languages that are missing.
One of the new features will be CSS themes.
Basically we will allow you to easily create a new .CSS file and load it into PFF to change the way it looks. The main idea here is to have fun customizing pff’s look with the possibility of creating a new default pff theme.
As with the Skin API, we’d like to make it easy for the comunity to ‘extend’ PFF and create new tabs with your own content.
The key here is to make it easy to add content, yet provide the user with control to easily install, enable and disable them.
A few simple examples someone could create off the top of my head
We are interested in your feedback and if you’d find this useful at all or have any suggestions.
powered by performancing firefox
As many of you know, we’ve been quietly working away at our upcoming ad network for sometime now. It’s always been the plan to eventually launch an ad network that serves the blogosphere well and helps compensate our publishers for their hard work. We’re not there yet, but we are ready to talk a little about it.
As part of the plan, we’re contemplating expanding the content offerings of Performancing by working together with acomplished authors writing about design, coding and other webmaster related topics that would be of interest to our core audience. A Performancing blog network if you will.
With the combined expertise on monetization, Search and promotion of the Performancing team, those authors we work with will have to worry about little else other than reading, and writing great content we hope — it’s the value add that we bring to the table in order to forge a partnership with exceptional authors.
We’d like to talk to people that blog about code and design subjects. Particularly those people that are already considered an authority in their field, and those with time to read a LOT of blogs on their subject, and post several times a day, every day.
Subjects such as:
The plan is simple, we want to expand performancing.com by working with authors on subdomains of our main site (eg design.performancing.com) in order to offer various complimentary channels to the Performancing mix
Those channels will be monetized with a mixture of referals (a designer-blogger that takes client work for example), Performancing Partners CPM ads, affiliate programs where applicable and various other means depending on the content offered.
We have some great folks here that really know their stuff on building traffic and monetizing, so that should be the least of your concerns hopefully.
For the right author, the sky is the limit. We can offer instant traffic, monetization and direction expertise and a healthy slice of the pie — details to be arranged per blogger, but the cut is not our main concern, our main concern is to put out quality content to the existing Performancing reader base, and to extend that base. Part of the monetization will also come from showcasing our CPM ads network: Performancing Partners
With a first class blog statistics program, and awesome blog editor and an audience already well on track to these kinds of topics there is i hope, much to say for joining forces with Performancing.
If you’d like to know more, please email me at [email protected]
powered by performancing firefox