<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trimming Startup Fat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/</link>
	<description>Invest In Performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:37:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: low cost auto insurance</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28265</link>
		<dc:creator>low cost auto insurance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28265</guid>
		<description>qyzgt8t-0ui5jj5-tw6q1f50-0 &lt;a href=&quot;http://onlineautoinsurance.webalias.com#2&quot;&gt;online auto insurance&lt;/a&gt; 
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/car-insurance_/#1 
[url=http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/health_insurance-/#3]health insurance[/url] 
[url]http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/affordable-health-insurance/#4[/url] 
[http://lowcostautoinsurance.escape.to#5 low cost auto insurance] 
&quot;online auto insurance&quot;:http://webalias.com/onlineautoinsurance#6 
[LINK http://fun.to/wholelifeinsurance#7]whole life insurance[/LINK]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>qyzgt8t-0ui5jj5-tw6q1f50-0 <a href="http://onlineautoinsurance.webalias.com#2">online auto insurance</a><br />
<a href="http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/car-insurance_/#1" rel="nofollow">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/car-insurance_/#1</a><br />
[url=http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/health_insurance-/#3]health insurance[/url]<br />
[url]http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/affordable-health-insurance/#4[/url]<br />
[http://lowcostautoinsurance.escape.to#5 low cost auto insurance]<br />
&#8220;online auto insurance&#8221;:<a href="http://webalias.com/onlineautoinsurance#6" rel="nofollow">http://webalias.com/onlineautoinsurance#6</a><br />
[LINK <a href="http://fun.to/wholelifeinsurance#7whole" rel="nofollow">http://fun.to/wholelifeinsurance#7whole</a> life insurance[/LINK]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mparaz</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28264</link>
		<dc:creator>mparaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 01:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28264</guid>
		<description>If you really can&#039;t keep it running, perhaps you could find a good buyer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you really can&#8217;t keep it running, perhaps you could find a good buyer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Wilson</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28263</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 11:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28263</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all the suggestions guys, I&#039;m working hard trying to find a solution but Im not too hopeful that it will be one that includes Metrics. 

I&#039;ll post when there is something definate to say, but now I just wanted to let you know that im still here, just real busy trying to fix a few things...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the suggestions guys, I&#8217;m working hard trying to find a solution but Im not too hopeful that it will be one that includes Metrics. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll post when there is something definate to say, but now I just wanted to let you know that im still here, just real busy trying to fix a few things&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Cronian</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28262</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Cronian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28262</guid>
		<description>Any ideas when the Metrics Tool will be pulled?

I&#039;d hope for some notice so us bloggers can find an alternative! 

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any ideas when the Metrics Tool will be pulled?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d hope for some notice so us bloggers can find an alternative! </p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TTSEO</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28261</link>
		<dc:creator>TTSEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28261</guid>
		<description>Personally I think that you under-estimate the power of metrics. I and many other people found performancing.com through metrics. And as Glen Stansberry pointed out, metrics forces its users to come back to performancing. While I wasn&#039;t interested in anything else at the beginning (just needed a good stats tool), time passing by, I have become interested in the other tools and the site as a whole.

Also worth mentioning, that blogrank (which relies on metrics) generates over 35000 backlinks (and many visitors) - and still growing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think that you under-estimate the power of metrics. I and many other people found performancing.com through metrics. And as Glen Stansberry pointed out, metrics forces its users to come back to performancing. While I wasn&#8217;t interested in anything else at the beginning (just needed a good stats tool), time passing by, I have become interested in the other tools and the site as a whole.</p>
<p>Also worth mentioning, that blogrank (which relies on metrics) generates over 35000 backlinks (and many visitors) &#8211; and still growing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Dash</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28260</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28260</guid>
		<description>I agree again  Greg has a good idea, and it&#039;s kind of what I said to Nick back in December, when I first stumbled onto Perf. But I also agree with Greg in that some people do buy mags for the ads. I did. When I was at my reading peak, I&#039;d go through about 20-30 mags a month, and really only for the ads, rarely for more than a feature story or a specific columnist. So depending on what you are now going to fill Perf&#039;s home page with, ads might actually be of value. You&#039;re all about blogging community, so ads for cool tools are relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree again  Greg has a good idea, and it&#8217;s kind of what I said to Nick back in December, when I first stumbled onto Perf. But I also agree with Greg in that some people do buy mags for the ads. I did. When I was at my reading peak, I&#8217;d go through about 20-30 mags a month, and really only for the ads, rarely for more than a feature story or a specific columnist. So depending on what you are now going to fill Perf&#8217;s home page with, ads might actually be of value. You&#8217;re all about blogging community, so ads for cool tools are relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xxclixxx</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28259</link>
		<dc:creator>xxclixxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28259</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather you guys stay in charge of it, but if that can&#039;t be the case open source would be much better. Too many good things have gone bad because someone else takes over and commercializes it. 

If you were to charge or accept donations for it, it would still be great, but if someone buys it from you they are most likely doing it for the income, and will it&#039;ll go down hill from there.

Open source you at least know it&#039;ll be people who aren&#039;t doing it just for the sake of money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather you guys stay in charge of it, but if that can&#8217;t be the case open source would be much better. Too many good things have gone bad because someone else takes over and commercializes it. </p>
<p>If you were to charge or accept donations for it, it would still be great, but if someone buys it from you they are most likely doing it for the income, and will it&#8217;ll go down hill from there.</p>
<p>Open source you at least know it&#8217;ll be people who aren&#8217;t doing it just for the sake of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eoecho Greg Magnus</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28258</link>
		<dc:creator>eoecho Greg Magnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28258</guid>
		<description>I agree with many of the comments above. It is a great tool that adds value and promotes your other paid services. Killing it will require additional investments in marketing. Go for a partnership and allow your partners to advertise. Also, why not offer the same ads we present on our blogs on yours? 

              Like right over there in all of that white space --------&gt;

If the ads are relevant they provide value to site visitors just like magazine ads (many people buy magazines mostly for the ads believe it or not).

Thanks for a great product. I&#039;m a management consultant and I&#039;ll be glad to offer a few pro-bono hours to the cause. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with many of the comments above. It is a great tool that adds value and promotes your other paid services. Killing it will require additional investments in marketing. Go for a partnership and allow your partners to advertise. Also, why not offer the same ads we present on our blogs on yours? </p>
<p>              Like right over there in all of that white space &#8212;&#8212;&#8211;></p>
<p>If the ads are relevant they provide value to site visitors just like magazine ads (many people buy magazines mostly for the ads believe it or not).</p>
<p>Thanks for a great product. I&#8217;m a management consultant and I&#8217;ll be glad to offer a few pro-bono hours to the cause. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Merz</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28257</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Merz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28257</guid>
		<description>Hey Nick, anything new?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nick, anything new?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilson Chua</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28256</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Chua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28256</guid>
		<description>If mparaz can take it, and add to it, we can host it for free to our fellow bloggers here in the Philippines! Nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If mparaz can take it, and add to it, we can host it for free to our fellow bloggers here in the Philippines! Nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thematchreferee</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28255</link>
		<dc:creator>thematchreferee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28255</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait for the new &quot;Partners&quot; features. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait for the new &#8220;Partners&#8221; features. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abhiauradkar</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28254</link>
		<dc:creator>abhiauradkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28254</guid>
		<description>Its one of the best add-ons that i have to my blog. Check out if you can rent out some processing power and the one who is providing you the processing power give him some services which he can expose to his clients. 
&lt;b&gt;really want to go open source??? &lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its one of the best add-ons that i have to my blog. Check out if you can rent out some processing power and the one who is providing you the processing power give him some services which he can expose to his clients.<br />
<b>really want to go open source??? </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mparaz</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28253</link>
		<dc:creator>mparaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28253</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d the code to be open sourced and released - hey we could even improve it! Then, host the code on your server as a paid managed service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d the code to be open sourced and released &#8211; hey we could even improve it! Then, host the code on your server as a paid managed service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Knaddison</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28252</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Knaddison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 07:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28252</guid>
		<description>You can Trim the fat or increase the revenues.

I&#039;d say this thread has shown some demand for PMetrics which you could use in some way to increase revenues instead of just killing PMetrics.  It has an added side affect: by charging even trivial amount for PMetrics you increase revenues and reduce the people who are zombie users - e.g. the people who maybe set it up and just leave it installed but never check in.  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can Trim the fat or increase the revenues.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say this thread has shown some demand for PMetrics which you could use in some way to increase revenues instead of just killing PMetrics.  It has an added side affect: by charging even trivial amount for PMetrics you increase revenues and reduce the people who are zombie users &#8211; e.g. the people who maybe set it up and just leave it installed but never check in.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Stansberry</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28251</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Stansberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28251</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve gotta agree at least somewhat with Markus.  If you check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alexaholic.com/performancing.com?y=p&amp;r=1y&amp;z=10&quot;&gt;alexa stats for Performancing&lt;/a&gt; since mid-march (when PMetrics was launched), you&#039;ll notice that the traffic and pageviews have really taken off.  Granted, I know part of that is because you&#039;ve launched other products too, but still... PMetrics has added a stickiness to your site, keeping visitors returning daily (some more than once).

I&#039;d say this really compliments your just released ad system.  Anything that allows you to put your other, more-profitable products on display is going to pay off in the long run.  But if you want to make it open source, I&#039;m not gonna complain ;)  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve gotta agree at least somewhat with Markus.  If you check out the <a href="http://www.alexaholic.com/performancing.com?y=p&#038;r=1y&#038;z=10">alexa stats for Performancing</a> since mid-march (when PMetrics was launched), you&#8217;ll notice that the traffic and pageviews have really taken off.  Granted, I know part of that is because you&#8217;ve launched other products too, but still&#8230; PMetrics has added a stickiness to your site, keeping visitors returning daily (some more than once).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say this really compliments your just released ad system.  Anything that allows you to put your other, more-profitable products on display is going to pay off in the long run.  But if you want to make it open source, I&#8217;m not gonna complain <img src='http://performancing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Cronian</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28250</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Cronian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 06:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28250</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the only reason why I visit Performancing.com

Can&#039;t you slap some Google Adsense on it, let it pay for itself, and this way you don&#039;t loose the traffic that it generates, and can afford to run with it.  I do read the blog entries, but only because I am looking at my blogs stats.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the only reason why I visit Performancing.com</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t you slap some Google Adsense on it, let it pay for itself, and this way you don&#8217;t loose the traffic that it generates, and can afford to run with it.  I do read the blog entries, but only because I am looking at my blogs stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nixcraft</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28249</link>
		<dc:creator>nixcraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 05:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28249</guid>
		<description>With such large userbase it will be good idea to start charging like $5-$10 for n number of hits and so on.

Put ads in exchange for free stats software

Personally I am ready to purchase version for $25-$50. I have other software such as mint. Yes I&#039;m interested to see source code as well.

Whatever decision you make don&#039;t kill it. I&#039;m dam sure most of us would like to purchase installable version.

Thanks for creating nice stats software.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With such large userbase it will be good idea to start charging like $5-$10 for n number of hits and so on.</p>
<p>Put ads in exchange for free stats software</p>
<p>Personally I am ready to purchase version for $25-$50. I have other software such as mint. Yes I&#8217;m interested to see source code as well.</p>
<p>Whatever decision you make don&#8217;t kill it. I&#8217;m dam sure most of us would like to purchase installable version.</p>
<p>Thanks for creating nice stats software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Short</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28248</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Short</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 04:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28248</guid>
		<description>Another option may be to combine a couple of the suggestions above.

Bloggers can have a free version that shows a small ad, or an ad free version for a monthly fee. With both options everyone benefits in some way and the hosting, support and bandwidth gets paid for.

Other metrics and counter services do something similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another option may be to combine a couple of the suggestions above.</p>
<p>Bloggers can have a free version that shows a small ad, or an ad free version for a monthly fee. With both options everyone benefits in some way and the hosting, support and bandwidth gets paid for.</p>
<p>Other metrics and counter services do something similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilson Chua</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28247</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Chua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28247</guid>
		<description>I think pmetrics is an important tool for bloggers. I am equally amenable to the following options:

1. Pay for its use
2. Pay for the license to host the service on our data center
3. Allow ads in exchange for using pmetrics

What is the bandwidth usage of pmetrics on a per blog basis? What i am trying to get at, is that , i have bandwidth to spare, and i think the same goes with others in this blog, we could do a cooperative venture of sorts, where, for example, we could host the pmetrics of Philippines, or asian blogs, and another party takes up US etc.. 


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think pmetrics is an important tool for bloggers. I am equally amenable to the following options:</p>
<p>1. Pay for its use<br />
2. Pay for the license to host the service on our data center<br />
3. Allow ads in exchange for using pmetrics</p>
<p>What is the bandwidth usage of pmetrics on a per blog basis? What i am trying to get at, is that , i have bandwidth to spare, and i think the same goes with others in this blog, we could do a cooperative venture of sorts, where, for example, we could host the pmetrics of Philippines, or asian blogs, and another party takes up US etc.. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Drago</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28246</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Drago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28246</guid>
		<description>you can always sell to b5 they just got a bunch of cash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can always sell to b5 they just got a bunch of cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Merz</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28245</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Merz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28245</guid>
		<description>Sorry guys, esp. to Nick who is playing the bad cop, but PMetrics is gold as an marketing instrument and a valuable tool for ALL bloggers growing from small to big and becoming interested in monetizing their sites.

PMetrics performance is still outstanding as it is today and by now you have got so many positive recommendations which is proof for my marketing argument.

To give that tool out of hand is a very bad decision marketing wise. And PMetrics is a great proof to everybody that you can handle the load. Also publishers will have open ears for such a reference.

Killing the blogs wasn&#039;t as bad but back then I thought this is already a bad marketing decision because you are killing personalities inside your community and degrade people to being forum content generators. The signal to noise argument is still pretty true.

Right now I can only speculate about the real reasons behind that decision but I will not do it in public because of my respect for the great work and the great products you have delivered in 2006. But respect at its best should work two ways.

BTW, the biggest advertising company on the Internet is running some great services, one of them being a state of the art analytics package. Think twice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry guys, esp. to Nick who is playing the bad cop, but PMetrics is gold as an marketing instrument and a valuable tool for ALL bloggers growing from small to big and becoming interested in monetizing their sites.</p>
<p>PMetrics performance is still outstanding as it is today and by now you have got so many positive recommendations which is proof for my marketing argument.</p>
<p>To give that tool out of hand is a very bad decision marketing wise. And PMetrics is a great proof to everybody that you can handle the load. Also publishers will have open ears for such a reference.</p>
<p>Killing the blogs wasn&#8217;t as bad but back then I thought this is already a bad marketing decision because you are killing personalities inside your community and degrade people to being forum content generators. The signal to noise argument is still pretty true.</p>
<p>Right now I can only speculate about the real reasons behind that decision but I will not do it in public because of my respect for the great work and the great products you have delivered in 2006. But respect at its best should work two ways.</p>
<p>BTW, the biggest advertising company on the Internet is running some great services, one of them being a state of the art analytics package. Think twice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkUFO</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28244</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkUFO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28244</guid>
		<description>I know I will cry if Metrics goes. It&#039;s simply the best tool out there. There MUST be a way to make it profitable? Advertisments? small monthly subscriptions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I will cry if Metrics goes. It&#8217;s simply the best tool out there. There MUST be a way to make it profitable? Advertisments? small monthly subscriptions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Dash</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28243</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28243</guid>
		<description>When you guys first hinted at Perf Partners, I thought maybe you might be doing this... Run rotated batch ads on all participating member blogs and give advertisers a nice volume price. I&#039;d be willing to give up some page real estate on my blogs for your advertisers ads (1-3) in return for access to metrics. You&#039;d have to do it on the basis of X impressions per month, not click-throughs, as my traffic is low (but climbing).

So for example, let&#039;s say I have 10 blogs running Perf Partner&#039;s house ad. For the sake of argument, let&#039;s say that my traffic per day per blog is between 50 pageviews (after search engines/ bots). It&#039;s a tiny amount per blog, but overall, that would be 500 impressions per day x 30 = 15,000 per month. Since I cover a wide range of topics, not every advertiser will want that space, so you might have to categorize (based on your tag system) and rotate.

It probably means retooling your code, but if you pull it off, it&#039;d be a low-cost way for advertisers to get some breadth in their ad presence without spending loads of money. And it might further entice other advertisers to pay for ads on the very same participating blogs. (At which point you&#039;d give their ads priority over the metrics-tied ads.)

There&#039;s a rough transition period of cash flow, no doubt, but I think that something like this could really work, and would leverage the Perf blogger community as well as give a different type of ROI for advertiser bucks. But the success hinges on proper blog categorization.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you guys first hinted at Perf Partners, I thought maybe you might be doing this&#8230; Run rotated batch ads on all participating member blogs and give advertisers a nice volume price. I&#8217;d be willing to give up some page real estate on my blogs for your advertisers ads (1-3) in return for access to metrics. You&#8217;d have to do it on the basis of X impressions per month, not click-throughs, as my traffic is low (but climbing).</p>
<p>So for example, let&#8217;s say I have 10 blogs running Perf Partner&#8217;s house ad. For the sake of argument, let&#8217;s say that my traffic per day per blog is between 50 pageviews (after search engines/ bots). It&#8217;s a tiny amount per blog, but overall, that would be 500 impressions per day x 30 = 15,000 per month. Since I cover a wide range of topics, not every advertiser will want that space, so you might have to categorize (based on your tag system) and rotate.</p>
<p>It probably means retooling your code, but if you pull it off, it&#8217;d be a low-cost way for advertisers to get some breadth in their ad presence without spending loads of money. And it might further entice other advertisers to pay for ads on the very same participating blogs. (At which point you&#8217;d give their ads priority over the metrics-tied ads.)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a rough transition period of cash flow, no doubt, but I think that something like this could really work, and would leverage the Perf blogger community as well as give a different type of ROI for advertiser bucks. But the success hinges on proper blog categorization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Garrett</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28242</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28242</guid>
		<description>I think we would want any open source effort to not need installing over and over for each blog. It would make sense for it to follow a similar layout where you could have multiple blogs on one install. This would also mean anyone could host it for friends without necessary resources.

I think as open source or commercial, I think it would be a wonderful piece of software for people to take and build upon. Not just because I had a hand in it but because I find it useful every day. I have looked at all the competition and metrics just feels the right way to do blog stats.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we would want any open source effort to not need installing over and over for each blog. It would make sense for it to follow a similar layout where you could have multiple blogs on one install. This would also mean anyone could host it for friends without necessary resources.</p>
<p>I think as open source or commercial, I think it would be a wonderful piece of software for people to take and build upon. Not just because I had a hand in it but because I find it useful every day. I have looked at all the competition and metrics just feels the right way to do blog stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mndoci</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/trimming_startup_fat/comment-page-1/#comment-28241</link>
		<dc:creator>mndoci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4016#comment-28241</guid>
		<description>Performancing is something I use heavily (more than any other metrics program).  Seeing it go away would be a shame.  I don&#039;t mind paying a small fee for it, but I suspect a large number of users are &quot;small&quot; bloggers like myself, so making it too expensive would be tough on us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Performancing is something I use heavily (more than any other metrics program).  Seeing it go away would be a shame.  I don&#8217;t mind paying a small fee for it, but I suspect a large number of users are &#8220;small&#8221; bloggers like myself, so making it too expensive would be tough on us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

