Feeds

social voting

PerformancingAds

 Social Meta Voting (SMV) - Looking for 10 Good Testers

Submitted by Ryan Caldwell on June 3, 2007 - 8:34pm in

Sometime in August or September, Performancing will be implementing an SMV system for members. Right now, I have a very rough prototype up here:

http://nudger.org/

I'm looking for about 10 individuals to help me test this system out over the summer. You'll be able to submit up to three articles per day and you'll be expected to vote on other stories.

One condition of participating is that you will not only submit articles, but also vote on the stories of others. Because of this, I'll need for you to send me your Digg, Netscape and Reddit user profiles.

If you're interested in working on this project with me, please send a PM via Performancing.


 Reasons Why I'm Liking Netscape Over Digg

Submitted by pholpher on May 18, 2007 - 6:41am in

Digg is getting on my nerves. I submitted an article from my wedding blog at digg and it got banned. They said I was spamming them. It was only my second submission from that blog. I didn't know two submissions could be spam.

However, Netscape has been growing on me. Ryan pointed me to Netscape on his college startup blog. Here's a couple reasons why I like Netscape over Digg.

1) Netscape has more categories for submissions. This is great for webmasters that have non-tech blogs. Digg has non-tech categories but not as many as Netscape. For example, the best place for me to submit a wedding post in Digg is the offbeat news category. However, at Netscape, I can submit to shopping, women, or even travel (destination weddings).

2) Netscape is friendlier. More people have added me as a friend at Netscape than Digg even though I've been more active at Digg.

3) I get more votes from Netscape. I think this is similar to reason 2. Netscape users seem more likely to vote for other submissions even without a reciprocal vote. It seems that Diggers won't vote for you unless you vote for them.

4) I submitted and voted on more things at Digg yet my Digg profile page is only a Page Rank 2. My Netscape profile page is a Page Rank 4.

I think what it boils down to is Netscape has a much more varied user base whereas Digg is mostly 22-35 year old males. It could be that Digg users don't want to talk about anything except sex, Apple computers, George Bush's mistakes, and the latest funny picture. :-O

So, if you haven't had much success at Digg, check out Netscape.


 The Benefits of Persistence: Part one

Submitted by Ryan Caldwell on May 10, 2007 - 2:01pm in

Speaking of persistence, just the other day I realized that I had a major social voting niche profile page with Page Rank 6. I honestly didn't use any trick. I didn't even try to build up the profile page. It just happened (as do most of the good things that I encounter on the web).

Well, it's not quite true that "it just happened" - there's a simple explanation. And it's an explanation that anyone can duplicate: persistent voting.

Every day, I submit articles and vote at a handful of social voting sites. About half of them are niche sites and the other half are general (reddit, digg, netscape).

I participate in social voting for the sole purpose of building traffic and acquiring links (as you know, eyeballs pay the bills). But as an unintended consequence of persistently submitting to these handful of social voting sites for about 10 months now, almost on a daily basis, I now have several PR 5 and PR 6 profile pages. For those of you not in the know, that translates into leverage and power.

By persisting and doing what works on a daily basis, as an unintended consequence, I'm now able to wield quite a bit of power with each vote (and pass PageRank right back into my sites).

Anyone else have some examples of how the side effects of persistence have paid off?


 Social Voting Help From The Performancing Community

Submitted by Ryan Caldwell on April 18, 2007 - 11:48am in

Need a little nudge on your favorite social voting site? If you post a link to your Reddit, Digg, Netscape, etc. submission in our new social voting forum we'll vote it up around 9am Eastern time.

Conditions:

1. The link should be a net benefit for the online community (spam will not be promoted)
2. You must post a link to the original article as well as each of the social voting submissions

If you like this idea, feel free to join in on the voting! Hopefully we can all help each other drive more traffic to our sites.

I started things up here:
http://performancing.com/node/6495