<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Flipped On It&#8217;s Head</title>
	<atom:link href="http://performancing.com/seo_flipped_on_it_s_head/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://performancing.com/seo_flipped_on_it_s_head/</link>
	<description>Helping Bloggers Succeed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:34:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Markus Merz</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/seo_flipped_on_it_s_head/comment-page-1/#comment-16644</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Merz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2275#comment-16644</guid>
		<description>The holy grail of picture analysis is automatic content recognition (picture description). Indexing text parts is a nice step in this direction.

SEO wise it will be a great step if literally a picture tells the search index more than 1,000 words </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The holy grail of picture analysis is automatic content recognition (picture description). Indexing text parts is a nice step in this direction.</p>
<p>SEO wise it will be a great step if literally a picture tells the search index more than 1,000 words</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pholpher</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/seo_flipped_on_it_s_head/comment-page-1/#comment-16643</link>
		<dc:creator>pholpher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2275#comment-16643</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amazing what technology can do these days.  I wonder which factor will have more weight - alt images tags or the text on the image itself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing what technology can do these days.  I wonder which factor will have more weight &#8211; alt images tags or the text on the image itself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
