<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real Comments, Spam URL&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://performancing.com/real-comments-spam-urls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://performancing.com/real-comments-spam-urls/</link>
	<description>Helping Bloggers Succeed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keir Harness</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/real-comments-spam-urls/comment-page-1/#comment-36421</link>
		<dc:creator>Keir Harness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4536#comment-36421</guid>
		<description>Given that Google now loves new content and activity post caffeine. I am testing serp on a blog by posting the 
product linked  comments e.g great post  etc which link to a busniess website. 
will measure for July / Aug. It is unclear from Google how they rate these comments as indicators of activity on a blog site and therfore a ranking measure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that Google now loves new content and activity post caffeine. I am testing serp on a blog by posting the<br />
product linked  comments e.g great post  etc which link to a busniess website.<br />
will measure for July / Aug. It is unclear from Google how they rate these comments as indicators of activity on a blog site and therfore a ranking measure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Graphics</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/real-comments-spam-urls/comment-page-1/#comment-31318</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Graphics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4536#comment-31318</guid>
		<description>This is totally frustrating! The best advice I can give (as a web developer) is to seek out keywords that are common spam and use a &quot;security/spam code&quot;. It can also be worth keeping a log of &quot;blacklisted&quot; IP addresses and, if it gets REALLY BAD, cap the number of comments a single IP can submit per day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is totally frustrating! The best advice I can give (as a web developer) is to seek out keywords that are common spam and use a &#8220;security/spam code&#8221;. It can also be worth keeping a log of &#8220;blacklisted&#8221; IP addresses and, if it gets REALLY BAD, cap the number of comments a single IP can submit per day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vacationer</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/real-comments-spam-urls/comment-page-1/#comment-30948</link>
		<dc:creator>Vacationer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4536#comment-30948</guid>
		<description>I must admit &quot;Vacationer&quot; is not my real name. I am also pretty sure that most people don&#039;t post their real names.  Looking at comments on Techcrunch today I see names like - Some Guy,  ajadoniz, The_BORG, browse, nil.... Do you think thats what their parents named them?

So when I call myself  &quot;Vacationer&quot; am I just using that as a pen name (because I like being on vacation) or am I promoting that keyword. Its a gray area, but if you allow entering the website, why waste time policing the Name? Its the quality of the comment (and free content your site is getting from me) thats important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit &#8220;Vacationer&#8221; is not my real name. I am also pretty sure that most people don&#8217;t post their real names.  Looking at comments on Techcrunch today I see names like &#8211; Some Guy,  ajadoniz, The_BORG, browse, nil&#8230;. Do you think thats what their parents named them?</p>
<p>So when I call myself  &#8220;Vacationer&#8221; am I just using that as a pen name (because I like being on vacation) or am I promoting that keyword. Its a gray area, but if you allow entering the website, why waste time policing the Name? Its the quality of the comment (and free content your site is getting from me) thats important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ogletree</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/real-comments-spam-urls/comment-page-1/#comment-30708</link>
		<dc:creator>ogletree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 07:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4536#comment-30708</guid>
		<description>I get comments where people read the title or just the first sentence and they try to make up a comment that sounds like they read it but it is still a &quot;great post&quot; type of comment then at the end their is some kw rich link.  Those are really easy to catch.  The ones that do the same thing but link only in the name/website fields I don&#039;t always catch those.  It is also real easy to catch the ones that make 3 or 4 comments.  It is a pretty clever way of getting links but they should know not to link in the comment and only make one comment.  I use spam karma and it catches all the bots but it does not catch the Indians that just surf all day and make comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get comments where people read the title or just the first sentence and they try to make up a comment that sounds like they read it but it is still a &#8220;great post&#8221; type of comment then at the end their is some kw rich link.  Those are really easy to catch.  The ones that do the same thing but link only in the name/website fields I don&#8217;t always catch those.  It is also real easy to catch the ones that make 3 or 4 comments.  It is a pretty clever way of getting links but they should know not to link in the comment and only make one comment.  I use spam karma and it catches all the bots but it does not catch the Indians that just surf all day and make comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to handle blog comments left in another language : Performancing</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/real-comments-spam-urls/comment-page-1/#comment-30475</link>
		<dc:creator>How to handle blog comments left in another language : Performancing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4536#comment-30475</guid>
		<description>[...] has already raised the issue of real comments with spammy URLs, and that&#8217;s something to deal with in its own right, but what I often find is comments left [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has already raised the issue of real comments with spammy URLs, and that&#8217;s something to deal with in its own right, but what I often find is comments left [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cessy</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/real-comments-spam-urls/comment-page-1/#comment-30074</link>
		<dc:creator>Cessy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4536#comment-30074</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s my problem, too. I run a few blogs and get lots of those spammy  comments which is quite irritating. However, I&#039;ve decided to approve comments, as long as it relates to the topic. If not, I just push delete! That&#039;s my rule and I stick to it so I don&#039;t waste my time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s my problem, too. I run a few blogs and get lots of those spammy  comments which is quite irritating. However, I&#8217;ve decided to approve comments, as long as it relates to the topic. If not, I just push delete! That&#8217;s my rule and I stick to it so I don&#8217;t waste my time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/real-comments-spam-urls/comment-page-1/#comment-29901</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4536#comment-29901</guid>
		<description>Those boxes are to give your NAME and URL. Not your Keywords. It isn&#039;t the keywords field. I don&#039;t mind people using their business URL in the URL field, but keywords for the Name is no good here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those boxes are to give your NAME and URL. Not your Keywords. It isn&#8217;t the keywords field. I don&#8217;t mind people using their business URL in the URL field, but keywords for the Name is no good here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/real-comments-spam-urls/comment-page-1/#comment-29875</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4536#comment-29875</guid>
		<description>This post is NOT SPAM in that I am not promoting spammy topics and illegitimate websites, but it IS SPAM in that I am linking my site to my favorite keywords in the name/website boxes above.

BUT, what are those boxes for anyway? 
No one is putting their real name and anyone entering a URL is promoting his/her site, blog or business.

I have the same issue on my blogs and if someone is providing any sort of interesting content, I allow it with their &quot;SPAM&quot;. I consider it the price (actually, free) I pay for the content and to generate discussion among my commentors.

What bothers me is the people who write &quot;great post&quot; and then link to &quot;Vacation Rental in Zimbabwe&quot; on my blog about Manhattan. The filtering process takes a little longer, but I accept all comments on my blog and prune every few days.

If I cut everyone who added their URL - I would have only my mother&#039;s comments on my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is NOT SPAM in that I am not promoting spammy topics and illegitimate websites, but it IS SPAM in that I am linking my site to my favorite keywords in the name/website boxes above.</p>
<p>BUT, what are those boxes for anyway?<br />
No one is putting their real name and anyone entering a URL is promoting his/her site, blog or business.</p>
<p>I have the same issue on my blogs and if someone is providing any sort of interesting content, I allow it with their &#8220;SPAM&#8221;. I consider it the price (actually, free) I pay for the content and to generate discussion among my commentors.</p>
<p>What bothers me is the people who write &#8220;great post&#8221; and then link to &#8220;Vacation Rental in Zimbabwe&#8221; on my blog about Manhattan. The filtering process takes a little longer, but I accept all comments on my blog and prune every few days.</p>
<p>If I cut everyone who added their URL &#8211; I would have only my mother&#8217;s comments on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/real-comments-spam-urls/comment-page-1/#comment-29824</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4536#comment-29824</guid>
		<description>I think, that as long as the comments are relative and add substance to the blog article, they should not be considered spam.  I agree with David.  I am new at all of this and I try to really contribute.  If I don&#039;t think I can contribute, I do not make a comment.  I browse a lot of blogs to see if I can find a blog nische that interests me enough to start my own blog.  The comment block asks for my website and I include one.  Am I not allowed to include my small advertisement, as long as it is not offensive or violates the spirit of the blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, that as long as the comments are relative and add substance to the blog article, they should not be considered spam.  I agree with David.  I am new at all of this and I try to really contribute.  If I don&#8217;t think I can contribute, I do not make a comment.  I browse a lot of blogs to see if I can find a blog nische that interests me enough to start my own blog.  The comment block asks for my website and I include one.  Am I not allowed to include my small advertisement, as long as it is not offensive or violates the spirit of the blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/real-comments-spam-urls/comment-page-1/#comment-29790</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4536#comment-29790</guid>
		<description>I see. Kind of like the guy who joins Toastmasters or Lions to network for his business, but still really participates. If they are really contributing, you&#039;re using them as much as they&#039;re using you. I&#039;d let them stay. With two exceptions: (1) they&#039;re crowding out others, (2) the links are not just irrelevant but incompatible. We try to be a family-friendly site and certain links are just not acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see. Kind of like the guy who joins Toastmasters or Lions to network for his business, but still really participates. If they are really contributing, you&#8217;re using them as much as they&#8217;re using you. I&#8217;d let them stay. With two exceptions: (1) they&#8217;re crowding out others, (2) the links are not just irrelevant but incompatible. We try to be a family-friendly site and certain links are just not acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/real-comments-spam-urls/comment-page-1/#comment-29785</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4536#comment-29785</guid>
		<description>David - Actually, I am getting lots of type 1 but they lead to &quot;buy drugname here&quot; links, or &quot;seo services from India&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8211; Actually, I am getting lots of type 1 but they lead to &#8220;buy drugname here&#8221; links, or &#8220;seo services from India&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/real-comments-spam-urls/comment-page-1/#comment-29783</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=4536#comment-29783</guid>
		<description>I find three levels of comments: (1) those that add value to the discussion, for example, proposing a counter-argument, (2) those that are nuetral in value, for example, &quot;Great post! You inspired me today,&quot; (3) those that interfere with the discussion, which includes both the pharmacy advertisements and the pure insults. I automatically label as spam type 3 comments. Type 1 comments are kept, no matter where the link leads (you won&#039;t delete mine, will you, just because it&#039;s for an unrelated blog?).

Type 2 is probably what you&#039;re referring to (I should come up with better terminology). These I keep if the linked website is on a related subject matter or if the commenter is known to me. If the comment is neutral but the link seems like spam, I&#039;ll delete the comment rather than mark it as spam. That way, if I got it wrong and the poster was actually being sincere, they&#039;ll have a second chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find three levels of comments: (1) those that add value to the discussion, for example, proposing a counter-argument, (2) those that are nuetral in value, for example, &#8220;Great post! You inspired me today,&#8221; (3) those that interfere with the discussion, which includes both the pharmacy advertisements and the pure insults. I automatically label as spam type 3 comments. Type 1 comments are kept, no matter where the link leads (you won&#8217;t delete mine, will you, just because it&#8217;s for an unrelated blog?).</p>
<p>Type 2 is probably what you&#8217;re referring to (I should come up with better terminology). These I keep if the linked website is on a related subject matter or if the commenter is known to me. If the comment is neutral but the link seems like spam, I&#8217;ll delete the comment rather than mark it as spam. That way, if I got it wrong and the poster was actually being sincere, they&#8217;ll have a second chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

