<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ranking in the Search Engines: Why It Takes So Long</title>
	<atom:link href="http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/</link>
	<description>Invest In Performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:37:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7 Tips for Bootstrapping Your Blog Traffic : Performancing</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-35510</link>
		<dc:creator>7 Tips for Bootstrapping Your Blog Traffic : Performancing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-35510</guid>
		<description>[...] links, why not emphasize that by deep linking? This potentially helps to reduce the waiting time it takes to rank in search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] links, why not emphasize that by deep linking? This potentially helps to reduce the waiting time it takes to rank in search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdatronix</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21663</link>
		<dc:creator>pdatronix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 11:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21663</guid>
		<description>All links are followed, unless specifically excluded with a nofollow tag. So if there&#039;s no rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; added, then we are properly &#039;rewarded&#039;, although we naturally still have to respect the very big Important! comment at the bottom about personal links ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All links are followed, unless specifically excluded with a nofollow tag. So if there&#8217;s no rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; added, then we are properly &#8216;rewarded&#8217;, although we naturally still have to respect the very big Important! comment at the bottom about personal links <img src='http://performancing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21662</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 11:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21662</guid>
		<description>I think comment links at Performancing *are* &quot;do follow&quot; in the sense that they are not &quot;no follow&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think comment links at Performancing *are* &#8220;do follow&#8221; in the sense that they are not &#8220;no follow&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Bumeter</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21664</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Bumeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 10:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21664</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would agree that it pays to be Bi&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There seems to be a bit of an underground movement amongst many bloggers to utilize the DoFollow plugin these days.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am perfectly aware of the history and why comments were degraded to a nofollow doldrum, but the nofollow policy setup by the cabal of search engines didn&#039;t really help.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Spam scanning tools like Akismet and Haloscan seem to do a better job of screening junk out of comments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Therefore, running a Do Follow plugin becomes an excellent way to reward readers for commenting.  By the logic of your article above, it would also be a great way to increase the bidirectional flow of links to your blog from the comments.  Plus, it encourages everone to not be quite so article selfish and get around to other blogs and just talk.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What do I mean by that last comment?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sometimes people start to respond to an article, and before you know it they have 300-400 words of a response.  The response itself is a passionate, sometimes factually strong refutation even, that can be a stand alone article.  Under a nofollow system, the person that leaves that comment is basically slapping a great piece of content in the trash.  It doesn&#039;t do much for the person that writes it and only provides marginal benefit to the blog that receives it.  Bloggers know this and so they often take that 300-400 words of a comment and drop it in their own blog as actual content.  The response becomes a linkbait response to the original article.  Maybe they link it and in odd why should I scratch the back of someone I passionately disagree with scenarios, they don&#039;t provide a link.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With do follow enabled on blogs, people can and do get a backlink reward from leaving a comment.  Kind of like going to a restaraunt, tipping the waiter / blogger, and then the waiter gives you a mint or something with your receipt.  The backlink is the mint.  Even in the scenarios where the comment is posted as an article elsewhere, there is now more motivation to link to the source article.  If the source article does follow and if they have trackback links running, then your link to them will generate a comment with your link in it and you both benefit from the links!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It almost makes Blogging something like an ecosystem.  Dare I say it becomes something like a self contained system, in a great big ball of bloggers working together.  If I were to attempt to coin a catch phrase, I&#039;d call it a &lt;strong&gt;Blogosphere&lt;/strong&gt;. I think a &lt;strong&gt;blogosphere&lt;/strong&gt; would be much more powerful than millions of little &lt;strong&gt;BlogoSilos&lt;/strong&gt;, but that&#039;s just my opinion.  Feel free to refute me, I&#039;m in the middle of adding Do Follow to my blogs, soon you&#039;ll be able to benefit from refuting me on your own blog&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just curious, is Performancing or Drupal capable of using something akin to a Do Follow policy?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree that it pays to be Bi</p>
<p>There seems to be a bit of an underground movement amongst many bloggers to utilize the DoFollow plugin these days.</p>
<p>I am perfectly aware of the history and why comments were degraded to a nofollow doldrum, but the nofollow policy setup by the cabal of search engines didn&#8217;t really help.</p>
<p>Spam scanning tools like Akismet and Haloscan seem to do a better job of screening junk out of comments.</p>
<p>Therefore, running a Do Follow plugin becomes an excellent way to reward readers for commenting.  By the logic of your article above, it would also be a great way to increase the bidirectional flow of links to your blog from the comments.  Plus, it encourages everone to not be quite so article selfish and get around to other blogs and just talk.</p>
<p>What do I mean by that last comment?</p>
<p>Sometimes people start to respond to an article, and before you know it they have 300-400 words of a response.  The response itself is a passionate, sometimes factually strong refutation even, that can be a stand alone article.  Under a nofollow system, the person that leaves that comment is basically slapping a great piece of content in the trash.  It doesn&#8217;t do much for the person that writes it and only provides marginal benefit to the blog that receives it.  Bloggers know this and so they often take that 300-400 words of a comment and drop it in their own blog as actual content.  The response becomes a linkbait response to the original article.  Maybe they link it and in odd why should I scratch the back of someone I passionately disagree with scenarios, they don&#8217;t provide a link.</p>
<p>With do follow enabled on blogs, people can and do get a backlink reward from leaving a comment.  Kind of like going to a restaraunt, tipping the waiter / blogger, and then the waiter gives you a mint or something with your receipt.  The backlink is the mint.  Even in the scenarios where the comment is posted as an article elsewhere, there is now more motivation to link to the source article.  If the source article does follow and if they have trackback links running, then your link to them will generate a comment with your link in it and you both benefit from the links!</p>
<p>It almost makes Blogging something like an ecosystem.  Dare I say it becomes something like a self contained system, in a great big ball of bloggers working together.  If I were to attempt to coin a catch phrase, I&#8217;d call it a <strong>Blogosphere</strong>. I think a <strong>blogosphere</strong> would be much more powerful than millions of little <strong>BlogoSilos</strong>, but that&#8217;s just my opinion.  Feel free to refute me, I&#8217;m in the middle of adding Do Follow to my blogs, soon you&#8217;ll be able to benefit from refuting me on your own blog</p>
<p>Just curious, is Performancing or Drupal capable of using something akin to a Do Follow policy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Dash</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21679</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 05:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21679</guid>
		<description>the problem with topsites is that if you&#039;re starting off low, some readers might look at your topsite position and think you suck, then not bother to come back. And unless you have a fairly high volume site, you probably will start off low.

But if you&#039;re high volume, at least relatively speaking, in your niche, then it could help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the problem with topsites is that if you&#8217;re starting off low, some readers might look at your topsite position and think you suck, then not bother to come back. And unless you have a fairly high volume site, you probably will start off low.</p>
<p>But if you&#8217;re high volume, at least relatively speaking, in your niche, then it could help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Bilal</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21678</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Bilal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 01:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21678</guid>
		<description>the only toplist site i&#039;d agree on is topsites.blogflux.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only toplist site i&#8217;d agree on is topsites.blogflux.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdatronix</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21677</link>
		<dc:creator>pdatronix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 19:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21677</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to ask this for a while. Does it make sense to submit your website for one of the many many toplist sites? Just a random example: http://superman.top-site-list.com/ (no, my site isn&#039;t about Superman) ;) And webrings? I never read about those. I know you&#039;re better of with a steady stream of article links, but does it hurt to have your site(s) listed (high)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to ask this for a while. Does it make sense to submit your website for one of the many many toplist sites? Just a random example: <a href="http://superman.top-site-list.com/" rel="nofollow">http://superman.top-site-list.com/</a> (no, my site isn&#8217;t about Superman) <img src='http://performancing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  And webrings? I never read about those. I know you&#8217;re better of with a steady stream of article links, but does it hurt to have your site(s) listed (high)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Dash</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21676</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 21:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21676</guid>
		<description>@thebutler: good advice. try variations, and you might do very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@thebutler: good advice. try variations, and you might do very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebutler</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21675</link>
		<dc:creator>thebutler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 19:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21675</guid>
		<description>IF and I say if you are trying to rank for something very common you&#039;re going to have a very, very hard time no matter what your PR is. Some sites might have been on the web for over 10 years and have been using the same keywords.

Even with a new site you might be able to rank quite high for a version/combination of your keywords. One example-Don&#039;t try to wine the race for -red wine-. Maybe try -california red wine- than move onto -oregon red wine-. In the short term you might get some results from the less searched term and in the long term you&#039;ll notice some improvements since those two phrases both contain your long term goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF and I say if you are trying to rank for something very common you&#8217;re going to have a very, very hard time no matter what your PR is. Some sites might have been on the web for over 10 years and have been using the same keywords.</p>
<p>Even with a new site you might be able to rank quite high for a version/combination of your keywords. One example-Don&#8217;t try to wine the race for -red wine-. Maybe try -california red wine- than move onto -oregon red wine-. In the short term you might get some results from the less searched term and in the long term you&#8217;ll notice some improvements since those two phrases both contain your long term goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Bilal</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21674</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Bilal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 11:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21674</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

set up a &#039;how to improve perf&#039; thread and i&#039;m sure you&#039;ll get plenty of suggestions. For a reboot, well,  i&#039;ll add you to the list :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>set up a &#8216;how to improve perf&#8217; thread and i&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll get plenty of suggestions. For a reboot, well,  i&#8217;ll add you to the list <img src='http://performancing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Dash</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21673</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 09:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21673</guid>
		<description>@pdatronix: Drupal was what the original Perf founders selected because of great support for multiple blogs and multiple forums. I love WordPress, believe me, but I think it&#039;d be hard to get the same feature set going as you see here at Perf. Even if that&#039;s not true, it&#039;s also a major project to switch over from Drupal to Wordpress :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pdatronix: Drupal was what the original Perf founders selected because of great support for multiple blogs and multiple forums. I love WordPress, believe me, but I think it&#8217;d be hard to get the same feature set going as you see here at Perf. Even if that&#8217;s not true, it&#8217;s also a major project to switch over from Drupal to WordPress :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21672</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 08:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21672</guid>
		<description>Drupal is a more robust backend than WordPress.  Since Performancing has always planned to be more than a blog, it was the smart choice.  Still, Drupal could learn a lot from the simplicity of WordPress!

BTW, I wasn&#039;t involved in the decision to go with Drupal, though I think it was the wise move, given the large vision for Performancing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drupal is a more robust backend than WordPress.  Since Performancing has always planned to be more than a blog, it was the smart choice.  Still, Drupal could learn a lot from the simplicity of WordPress!</p>
<p>BTW, I wasn&#8217;t involved in the decision to go with Drupal, though I think it was the wise move, given the large vision for Performancing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdatronix</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21671</link>
		<dc:creator>pdatronix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 08:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21671</guid>
		<description>Maybe I missed this way earlier, but why did you chose Drupal as your blogging platform? I don&#039;t mean to start any &#039;application&#039; wars: I&#039;m just curious  (also since you said a few blog posts back Drupal is a b**ch to upgrade)

By the way: post Dugg for ya  I don&#039;t have Netscape and Reddit accounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I missed this way earlier, but why did you chose Drupal as your blogging platform? I don&#8217;t mean to start any &#8216;application&#8217; wars: I&#8217;m just curious  (also since you said a few blog posts back Drupal is a b**ch to upgrade)</p>
<p>By the way: post Dugg for ya  I don&#8217;t have Netscape and Reddit accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21670</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 08:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21670</guid>
		<description>Coming soon to a theatre near you.  

Honestly, we should do a blog reboot with Module suggestions.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming soon to a theatre near you.  </p>
<p>Honestly, we should do a blog reboot with Module suggestions.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Bilal</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21669</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Bilal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 08:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21669</guid>
		<description>Ryan, what happened to using a digg plugin / module? Don&#039;t blame drupal for it :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, what happened to using a digg plugin / module? Don&#8217;t blame drupal for it <img src='http://performancing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21668</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 07:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21668</guid>
		<description>Push this article:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://digg.com/tech_news/Ranking_in_the_Search_Engines_Why_It_Takes_So_Long&quot;&gt;http://digg.com/tech_news/Ranking_in_the_Search_Engines_Why_It_Takes_So_Long&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.netscape.com/story/2007/05/18/ranking-in-the-search-engines-why-it-takes-so-long/&quot;&gt;http://tech.netscape.com/story/2007/05/18/ranking-in-the-search-engines-why-it-takes-so-long/&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://reddit.com/info/1rpec/comments&quot;&gt;http://reddit.com/info/1rpec/comments&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Push this article:</p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/Ranking_in_the_Search_Engines_Why_It_Takes_So_Long">http://digg.com/tech_news/Ranking_in_the_Search_Engines_Why_It_Takes_So_Long</a></p>
<p><a href="http://tech.netscape.com/story/2007/05/18/ranking-in-the-search-engines-why-it-takes-so-long/">http://tech.netscape.com/story/2007/05/18/ranking-in-the-search-engines-why-it-takes-so-long/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://reddit.com/info/1rpec/comments">http://reddit.com/info/1rpec/comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Dash</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21667</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 07:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21667</guid>
		<description>Ahmed, if you read carefully, I said that I was focusing on a partial discussion of how PR may be built up, and a few factors that may affect it. I don&#039;t know what you&#039;re nitpicking because you don&#039;t say. Are you implying that everything I&#039;ve said is wrong? Clarify yourself, please. I approach most search engine discussions from a mathematical viewpoint, and I think I make that pretty clear. Anyone who isn&#039;t interested won&#039;t read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed, if you read carefully, I said that I was focusing on a partial discussion of how PR may be built up, and a few factors that may affect it. I don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re nitpicking because you don&#8217;t say. Are you implying that everything I&#8217;ve said is wrong? Clarify yourself, please. I approach most search engine discussions from a mathematical viewpoint, and I think I make that pretty clear. Anyone who isn&#8217;t interested won&#8217;t read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Bilal</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21666</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Bilal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 02:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21666</guid>
		<description>ok, nitpicking all of it might take too long 

general idea - yes, PageRank is a useful measure of blog value and search ranking potential, but it&#039;s not all there is to it.

Talking about this makes me angry, because half of me wants to defend SEO against the naysayers who criticise it simply because it doesn&#039;t match their world views and their negative perception of this field makes it hard for an seo consultant to even talk to them without hearing crap.

The other half just makes me laugh, because yea, there are different ways to getting to the top of the SE rankings. Blogging and linkbaiting works just as well as SEO, because they are eventually two sides of the same coin.

You can be a linkbaiting linkwhore, or you can be a link request linkwhore - bottom line, you&#039;re still lifting up your skirt to get paid, and you shouldn&#039;t forget that, whether you&#039;re a blogging evangelist or a hardcore SEO.

cheers </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, nitpicking all of it might take too long </p>
<p>general idea &#8211; yes, PageRank is a useful measure of blog value and search ranking potential, but it&#8217;s not all there is to it.</p>
<p>Talking about this makes me angry, because half of me wants to defend SEO against the naysayers who criticise it simply because it doesn&#8217;t match their world views and their negative perception of this field makes it hard for an seo consultant to even talk to them without hearing crap.</p>
<p>The other half just makes me laugh, because yea, there are different ways to getting to the top of the SE rankings. Blogging and linkbaiting works just as well as SEO, because they are eventually two sides of the same coin.</p>
<p>You can be a linkbaiting linkwhore, or you can be a link request linkwhore &#8211; bottom line, you&#8217;re still lifting up your skirt to get paid, and you shouldn&#8217;t forget that, whether you&#8217;re a blogging evangelist or a hardcore SEO.</p>
<p>cheers </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Bilal</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/ranking_in_the_search_engines__why_it_takes_so_long/comment-page-1/#comment-21665</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Bilal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 02:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3119#comment-21665</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;That&#039;s especially true since many ad networks and &quot;pay per review&quot; services determine your earnings per unit using PR, amongst other metrics.&lt;/em&gt;

ad networks and pay per review services value PR because it&#039;s an easy metric to measure relative link popularity, that does not make PR valuable in rankings in itself. 

There are other reasons why it is valuable - being used by TLA or ReviewMe isn&#039;t one of them.

Going back to the rest of the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>That&#8217;s especially true since many ad networks and &#8220;pay per review&#8221; services determine your earnings per unit using PR, amongst other metrics.</em></p>
<p>ad networks and pay per review services value PR because it&#8217;s an easy metric to measure relative link popularity, that does not make PR valuable in rankings in itself. </p>
<p>There are other reasons why it is valuable &#8211; being used by TLA or ReviewMe isn&#8217;t one of them.</p>
<p>Going back to the rest of the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

