<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keeping Things Simple With Blog Promotion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://performancing.com/keeping_things_simple_with_blog_promotion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://performancing.com/keeping_things_simple_with_blog_promotion/</link>
	<description>Helping Bloggers Succeed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/keeping_things_simple_with_blog_promotion/comment-page-1/#comment-14662</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 06:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2099#comment-14662</guid>
		<description>Brian, I agree, the advanced stuff is in short supply.  No question, but don&#039;t you also think that there&#039;s too much filler in a lot of these lists?  Don&#039;t you think there&#039;s room for &quot;The essential list&quot; or a distinction between &quot;a few core strategies&quot; and &quot;if you&#039;ve got the time try these too.&quot;

My point here is just that just like most online visitors only go to something like 5-10 websites per day, I&#039;m willing to bet that most probloggers have their &quot;core&quot; list of 2-5 things they do on a daily basis for promotion, and then maybe another 5-10 things they might do on a weekly or monthly basis.

Some things pay off way better than others.  Many things that get &quot;recommended&quot; turn out to be completely worthless.  All I&#039;m saying is that it would be nice if there were an authoritative &quot;daily core list&quot; of promotional activities that work well and have tangible payoff.  

Sort of like a standards board for SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, I agree, the advanced stuff is in short supply.  No question, but don&#8217;t you also think that there&#8217;s too much filler in a lot of these lists?  Don&#8217;t you think there&#8217;s room for &#8220;The essential list&#8221; or a distinction between &#8220;a few core strategies&#8221; and &#8220;if you&#8217;ve got the time try these too.&#8221;</p>
<p>My point here is just that just like most online visitors only go to something like 5-10 websites per day, I&#8217;m willing to bet that most probloggers have their &#8220;core&#8221; list of 2-5 things they do on a daily basis for promotion, and then maybe another 5-10 things they might do on a weekly or monthly basis.</p>
<p>Some things pay off way better than others.  Many things that get &#8220;recommended&#8221; turn out to be completely worthless.  All I&#8217;m saying is that it would be nice if there were an authoritative &#8220;daily core list&#8221; of promotional activities that work well and have tangible payoff.  </p>
<p>Sort of like a standards board for SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Dash</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/keeping_things_simple_with_blog_promotion/comment-page-1/#comment-14664</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2099#comment-14664</guid>
		<description>@Ryan: what Brian said plus, a lot of those &quot;X ways&quot; articles have been designed for browsing quickly by bloggers at any level. If you&#039;re advanced, you gloss over the list. If you&#039;re a beginner, the assumption is that you&#039;d follow the link that a bullet provides so that you can learn more detail. (If there is no link, then ask, leave a comment.) If you&#039;re in between, you gloss over what you know and study what you don&#039;t.

How much simpler could it be? I&#039;m going to piss off a lot of people but the real problem is that a lot of people don&#039;t follow advice. There&#039;s lots of it. Try one blogger&#039;s advice. If it doesn&#039;t work, try someone else&#039;s. Or, read different opinions and formulate your own. Test your hypotheses by spending (precious) time trying different things. It really does take time to learn, to become a successful blogger, and most people are not willing to spend that time. That&#039;ll be the difference between a blogger who succeeds and a blogger who doesn&#039;t.

Your site, by the way, is probably being bombarded right now, as I can&#039;t get it to come up. So I can&#039;t see what you wrote (though I think I&#039;ve already read it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ryan: what Brian said plus, a lot of those &#8220;X ways&#8221; articles have been designed for browsing quickly by bloggers at any level. If you&#8217;re advanced, you gloss over the list. If you&#8217;re a beginner, the assumption is that you&#8217;d follow the link that a bullet provides so that you can learn more detail. (If there is no link, then ask, leave a comment.) If you&#8217;re in between, you gloss over what you know and study what you don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>How much simpler could it be? I&#8217;m going to piss off a lot of people but the real problem is that a lot of people don&#8217;t follow advice. There&#8217;s lots of it. Try one blogger&#8217;s advice. If it doesn&#8217;t work, try someone else&#8217;s. Or, read different opinions and formulate your own. Test your hypotheses by spending (precious) time trying different things. It really does take time to learn, to become a successful blogger, and most people are not willing to spend that time. That&#8217;ll be the difference between a blogger who succeeds and a blogger who doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Your site, by the way, is probably being bombarded right now, as I can&#8217;t get it to come up. So I can&#8217;t see what you wrote (though I think I&#8217;ve already read it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Clark</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/keeping_things_simple_with_blog_promotion/comment-page-1/#comment-14663</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2099#comment-14663</guid>
		<description>but there&#039;s plenty of simple (simplistic?) advice out there for the taking.  In fact, there&#039;s not a shortage of it at all.  It&#039;s the advanced stuff that&#039;s in short supply.

107 does not equal quality or advanced.  It only equals 107.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but there&#8217;s plenty of simple (simplistic?) advice out there for the taking.  In fact, there&#8217;s not a shortage of it at all.  It&#8217;s the advanced stuff that&#8217;s in short supply.</p>
<p>107 does not equal quality or advanced.  It only equals 107.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

