<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Pages, Short-lived Fad or Still Useful?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://performancing.com/facebook-pages-short-lived-fad-or-still-useful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://performancing.com/facebook-pages-short-lived-fad-or-still-useful/</link>
	<description>Helping Bloggers Succeed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Lee</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/facebook-pages-short-lived-fad-or-still-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-35482</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 11:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=7136#comment-35482</guid>
		<description>I also promote some of my affiliate links on Facebook by making Facebook fan pages and also by advertising on Facebook.:`.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also promote some of my affiliate links on Facebook by making Facebook fan pages and also by advertising on Facebook.:`.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacqueline</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/facebook-pages-short-lived-fad-or-still-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-33314</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacqueline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=7136#comment-33314</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s more likely, given the push by users to have more granular privacy controls, that FB is doing a CYA in case a user becomes a fan of a page but chooses to opt out of receiving posts and/or having them show up in their news feed.  They can&#039;t continue to guarantee that they can post it if the user chooses not to have it posted. 
Remember that they have to respond to non-US privacy laws that are stricter - consider the legal issue they are dealing with in Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s more likely, given the push by users to have more granular privacy controls, that FB is doing a CYA in case a user becomes a fan of a page but chooses to opt out of receiving posts and/or having them show up in their news feed.  They can&#8217;t continue to guarantee that they can post it if the user chooses not to have it posted.<br />
Remember that they have to respond to non-US privacy laws that are stricter &#8211; consider the legal issue they are dealing with in Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/facebook-pages-short-lived-fad-or-still-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-33299</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=7136#comment-33299</guid>
		<description>You make a very good point, but don&#039;t you think Facebook put this in their TOS just so that if something doesn&#039;t get posted they are covered and NOT stating that they won&#039;t post items??? just a thought? If it is true you are correct in that it will change how and if facebook pages will be used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a very good point, but don&#8217;t you think Facebook put this in their TOS just so that if something doesn&#8217;t get posted they are covered and NOT stating that they won&#8217;t post items??? just a thought? If it is true you are correct in that it will change how and if facebook pages will be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

