<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carnival of Internet Pros #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://performancing.com/carnival_of_internet_pros_2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://performancing.com/carnival_of_internet_pros_2/</link>
	<description>Invest In Performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:37:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Camden</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/carnival_of_internet_pros_2/comment-page-1/#comment-29838</link>
		<dc:creator>Sterling Camden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3129#comment-29838</guid>
		<description>I just now got a pingback on this one.  Thanks for the kind words on my Geeks are Sexy article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just now got a pingback on this one.  Thanks for the kind words on my Geeks are Sexy article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/carnival_of_internet_pros_2/comment-page-1/#comment-21779</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3129#comment-21779</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are about 5 or 6 methods that are actually worthwhile and the rest are complete garbage.&quot;

Rich, could you point us towards a reference or maybe give us a primer on this subject?  I&#039;m in the dark on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are about 5 or 6 methods that are actually worthwhile and the rest are complete garbage.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rich, could you point us towards a reference or maybe give us a primer on this subject?  I&#8217;m in the dark on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Dash</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/carnival_of_internet_pros_2/comment-page-1/#comment-21782</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 08:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3129#comment-21782</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Rich.   Ian, do you want to comment?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Rich.   Ian, do you want to comment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich McIver</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/carnival_of_internet_pros_2/comment-page-1/#comment-21781</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich McIver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 15:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3129#comment-21781</guid>
		<description>Raj,
I know the point of these posts is to spur some actual debate and additional feedback, so here goes: 

I just read through: &quot;Blog Startup: Choosing a Domain by Ian Fernando of Ian Fernando.&quot;

The quick summary of the article is that Ian wants you to focus on keywords when picking a domain.  What I don&#039;t like about this simplistic analysis is that it misses the biggest element to success, figuring out which keyword to search.

Ian should have gone through how to pick among the literally thousands of different ways to go about selecting a keyword to base your domain around.  There are about 5 or 6 methods that are actually worthwhile and the rest are complete garbage. By going through those methods he could have turned this article into a real gem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raj,<br />
I know the point of these posts is to spur some actual debate and additional feedback, so here goes: </p>
<p>I just read through: &#8220;Blog Startup: Choosing a Domain by Ian Fernando of Ian Fernando.&#8221;</p>
<p>The quick summary of the article is that Ian wants you to focus on keywords when picking a domain.  What I don&#8217;t like about this simplistic analysis is that it misses the biggest element to success, figuring out which keyword to search.</p>
<p>Ian should have gone through how to pick among the literally thousands of different ways to go about selecting a keyword to base your domain around.  There are about 5 or 6 methods that are actually worthwhile and the rest are complete garbage. By going through those methods he could have turned this article into a real gem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samir</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/carnival_of_internet_pros_2/comment-page-1/#comment-21780</link>
		<dc:creator>Samir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=3129#comment-21780</guid>
		<description>Raj, first off, thanks for the link and for taking the time to put this together. With all the submissions you get, I&#039;m sure that&#039;s a daunting task all by itself. 

In addition you have gone to the trouble to comment on articles individually, which I highly appreciate. It is very refreshing to hear a constructive critique of your work from a third party - always useful to see a fresh perspective on things. I will seriously consider your comments about the layout. Thank you once again for the input.

I have yet to browse through the wealth of material in the post. Once I have done that I will come back here with my thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raj, first off, thanks for the link and for taking the time to put this together. With all the submissions you get, I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s a daunting task all by itself. </p>
<p>In addition you have gone to the trouble to comment on articles individually, which I highly appreciate. It is very refreshing to hear a constructive critique of your work from a third party &#8211; always useful to see a fresh perspective on things. I will seriously consider your comments about the layout. Thank you once again for the input.</p>
<p>I have yet to browse through the wealth of material in the post. Once I have done that I will come back here with my thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

