Feeds

Dave's blog

 I'm a bipolar blogger

Submitted by Dave on August 21, 2007 - 6:09pm in

Writing for a blog is like writing for any other form, you have highs and lows in terms of producing content. What's important is that you remain consistent in the numbers and length of posts that you produce. People are far more likely to respond positively to what you have to say if they have some idea of what they can expect from you.

This doesn't mean you have to pigeonhole yourself into producing only certain types of posts. What it does mean is that you have an obligation to be smart about how you use the content you produce to create a better experience for your readers.

For example, I would definitely describe myself as a bipolar blogger. That is, I have manic episodes of producing stacks and stacks of content – my mind is buzzing with ideas for posts, I've got the time to get them written, I don't have too many distractions. But there are also times when I've got blogger's block and can't bring myself to produce anything. The trick is to try and manage the ebb and flow of my content creation to try and appear more consistent, even if I'm not.

It helps that the blogging I do can be split into two main categories. Firstly, there are posts like this one, longer, maybe more thoughtful and most importantly, time unspecific. Quite frankly I could post this entry today, or next week, or next month, and it wouldn't lose (or gain) relevance as a result.

The second type of blogging I do is more news based, whether it be reviews of new services, reports of goings-on in the world of web 2.0 gleaned from sources like TechCrunch or ValleyWag, which are shorter, to the point and very time specific.

If I am in a manic writing mood, I try and get as many of the longer posts written as possible, and save them on my desktop PC for use later on. I don't post them all in one go – it would be a waste because, if nothing else, readers won't pay attention if ten massive articles appear on one day in their reader. Instead, I hoard the non-time critical articles for blogging slumps, when I might be struggling for time or concentration to write them.

WordPress, the blogging platform I use here, provides two ways in which I can store the blog hoard online. One is simply to add posts and save them as drafts, only clicking the publish button when the time is right. Another option, which is great if you are going away, is to publish a post with a future date on it. This means the post will only hit the front page on the date one specifies, thus automating the publishing process to a certain extent.

As for the time specific news posts, well, I consider them to be non-critical to the blog. Most people that read FEconnect will read other blogs too, and while my efforts to put my own spin on them might help people see how they could use certain technologies or why developments are relevant to them, I don't think folk would miss them if the bigger bits are still being produced. So, when I am terribly busy, good quality content is still being produced, albeit it's all of a longer nature than the short bursts of news.

Of course, it's quite possible that trying to manage my bipolar blogging will break down at some point – like an extended period of struggling to find the time to write – but by stretching out the longer posts over time, I can hopefully make this a less likely occurrence.

What about your blogging? Are you a bipolar blogger – or can you achieve effortless consistency (if so, then I hate you)?


 5 Minute Podcasting

Submitted by Dave on February 5, 2007 - 9:11pm in

Following Nick's lead, I've done my own 5 minute podcast. Big shout to Nick for coming up with a great format.

I've set up a new domain for my podcasts: 5MinutePodcasts.com.

Any feedback gratefully received.


 Editing comments

Submitted by Dave on January 26, 2007 - 11:57pm in

Steve Rubel asks why it is that not many blogging and other social media platforms allow commenters to edit or delete the comments they make on community based sites.

Everyone sticks their foot in it from time to time. If you do this
on your own blog, you can edit the post and take it back. You could
delete the post too, but it's not looked on very positively. Still, if
you leave a comment on some other site, you very often need to live
with it. So you better think twice before lambasting your friend for
slamming Jethro Tull on his blog.

There's really no reason why community sites shouldn't offer this
option. It's good for everyone involved. Three sites, at least that I
know of, allow you to edit or even delete your comments. They're the
social saints.

These 'social saints' are Flickr, Blogger and Facebook.

WordPress, the engine I use for my blog, doesn't feature the ability for commenters to edit what they write. There might be a plugin out there that does something like that, I don't know. But for me, it should be up to the blogger - the site owner - whether a comment is changed or deleted. A commenter can always send an email to the site owner, or add another comment clarifying things.

To my mind, the person that makes the decision on the site is the person that is responsible for it. There have been countless examples of bloggers getting grief for deleting comments from their sites - allowing others to do so just clouds matters and complicates things, especially when the deleted or edited comment has already become a part of a conversation.