Comments on: AOL Muscles in on Financial Blogging http://performancing.com/aol_muscles_in_on_financial_blogging/ Invest In Performance Wed, 16 May 2012 15:37:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Nick Wilson http://performancing.com/aol_muscles_in_on_financial_blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-27348 Nick Wilson Mon, 01 May 2006 00:34:36 +0000 http://performancing.com/?p=3910#comment-27348 Yes, i've seen those links. Whereas they dont bother me in the slightest, it does crack me up that GOOG own a stake in AOL now If they follow suit on this one though, it will be the first one where AOL has had 100% influence. So will set a slightly different tone for what AOL see as acceptable and not.... Yes, i’ve seen those links.

Whereas they dont bother me in the slightest, it does crack me up that GOOG own a stake in AOL now

If they follow suit on this one though, it will be the first one where AOL has had 100% influence. So will set a slightly different tone for what AOL see as acceptable and not….

]]> By: aaron wall http://performancing.com/aol_muscles_in_on_financial_blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-27347 aaron wall Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:34:20 +0000 http://performancing.com/?p=3910#comment-27347 Sorry Andy, but I got to hate on your hate ;) Stock channels may not be lucrative for AdSense, but investors are all about spending money to make money. There is lots of money and influence reading the top stock channels. Reaching those people is worth a lot of cash if you go full on with making it legit. Some underpriced keyword markets may be underpriced because the AdSense model just does not fit them right. >straight, or condomed? They sell off topic spammy non-condom poker links on the right sidebar on over 40 of their other blogs. Sorry Andy, but I got to hate on your hate ;)

Stock channels may not be lucrative for AdSense, but investors are all about spending money to make money. There is lots of money and influence reading the top stock channels. Reaching those people is worth a lot of cash if you go full on with making it legit.

Some underpriced keyword markets may be underpriced because the AdSense model just does not fit them right.

>straight, or condomed?

They sell off topic spammy non-condom poker links on the right sidebar on over 40 of their other blogs.

]]> By: Andy Hagans http://performancing.com/aol_muscles_in_on_financial_blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-27346 Andy Hagans Fri, 28 Apr 2006 06:23:05 +0000 http://performancing.com/?p=3910#comment-27346 > lucrative keyword areas in the blogosphere I wouldn't call stock picks a lucrative keyword area... maybe middlin' at best :-) > lucrative keyword areas in the blogosphere

I wouldn’t call stock picks a lucrative keyword area… maybe middlin’ at best :-)

]]> By: mbhunter http://performancing.com/aol_muscles_in_on_financial_blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-27345 mbhunter Thu, 27 Apr 2006 06:35:25 +0000 http://performancing.com/?p=3910#comment-27345 Did anyone else notice that BloggingStocks breaks AdSense' T&C by having more than three ad units on a page? Google will probably forgive them, though. Did anyone else notice that BloggingStocks breaks AdSense’ T&C by having more than three ad units on a page? Google will probably forgive them, though.

]]> By: Chris Garrett http://performancing.com/aol_muscles_in_on_financial_blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-27344 Chris Garrett Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:11:09 +0000 http://performancing.com/?p=3910#comment-27344 So these AOL guys are being paid to boost the stocks they own to a massive audience of investors? Does anyone else find that dodgy? ... would certainly need some sort of iron-clad legal advice to set up such a scheme shirley? So these AOL guys are being paid to boost the stocks they own to a massive audience of investors? Does anyone else find that dodgy? … would certainly need some sort of iron-clad legal advice to set up such a scheme shirley?

]]>