<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Ways To Diversify Your Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/</link>
	<description>Helping Bloggers Succeed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wahw33d</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/comment-page-1/#comment-35940</link>
		<dc:creator>wahw33d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2122#comment-35940</guid>
		<description>I agree with those five ways. Especially with the first explanation about linkbuilding. I will do it soon coz i want to know if it impacts my pagerank or not... thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with those five ways. Especially with the first explanation about linkbuilding. I will do it soon coz i want to know if it impacts my pagerank or not&#8230; thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard McGarry</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/comment-page-1/#comment-14920</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard McGarry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 05:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2122#comment-14920</guid>
		<description>Brett, the category slug is chosen on the oldest category you select. Good luck whatever you decide to do, but I&#039;m with Raj. Unless you have a never-changing set of categories, you&#039;ll run into trouble the minute you decide to manage your categories differently!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett, the category slug is chosen on the oldest category you select. Good luck whatever you decide to do, but I&#8217;m with Raj. Unless you have a never-changing set of categories, you&#8217;ll run into trouble the minute you decide to manage your categories differently!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ifranky</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/comment-page-1/#comment-14919</link>
		<dc:creator>ifranky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 15:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2122#comment-14919</guid>
		<description>Having played quite a lot with the category slug, nowadays I start with the standard  year/month/day permalinks and the first 50-70 entries I don&#039;t really focus on a limited number of categories.
In UTW I use &#039;assign tag for category&#039; (or similar expression) and then after 50-70 entries I trim down the numbers of categories (and use Dean&#039;s permalink migrration plugin for the 301)

Especially after last weekend&#039;s PR update I think it could become a great strategy since I have seen many tag-slugs end up in the supplemental index (no worries, I know it&#039;s not bad and don&#039;t bother too much with the HELL part of it).
When following that strategy I think it is a good way to improve the value of 8-12 (depending on the number of categories) keywords.

But yes, I agree... starting with categoryslug from day 1 might bring problems in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having played quite a lot with the category slug, nowadays I start with the standard  year/month/day permalinks and the first 50-70 entries I don&#8217;t really focus on a limited number of categories.<br />
In UTW I use &#8216;assign tag for category&#8217; (or similar expression) and then after 50-70 entries I trim down the numbers of categories (and use Dean&#8217;s permalink migrration plugin for the 301)</p>
<p>Especially after last weekend&#8217;s PR update I think it could become a great strategy since I have seen many tag-slugs end up in the supplemental index (no worries, I know it&#8217;s not bad and don&#8217;t bother too much with the HELL part of it).<br />
When following that strategy I think it is a good way to improve the value of 8-12 (depending on the number of categories) keywords.</p>
<p>But yes, I agree&#8230; starting with categoryslug from day 1 might bring problems in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Dash</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/comment-page-1/#comment-14918</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 07:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2122#comment-14918</guid>
		<description>@SEOguruIndia: I haven&#039;t a clue what you&#039;re saying, other than trying to advertise your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SEOguruIndia: I haven&#8217;t a clue what you&#8217;re saying, other than trying to advertise your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Dash</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/comment-page-1/#comment-14917</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 19:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2122#comment-14917</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m never using category slugs in my permalinks. Category archives are still fine by me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m never using category slugs in my permalinks. Category archives are still fine by me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Bumeter</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/comment-page-1/#comment-14916</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Bumeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 18:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2122#comment-14916</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I like using categories in the slug.  The thing is I use multiple categories when I tag an article.  This allows my readers to cross reference topics on my blogs.  Only the first category gets slugged (I think its either alphabetical order or the first one checked).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have been writing a lot of articles on the same topic and when I categorize them I then use the category url as a link into my blog from other sites.  For example, I have written a dozen or more articles on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.softduit.com/mavenmappersinformation/category/software/voice-recognition/&quot;&gt;Voice Recognition&lt;/a&gt; and use that category to send people to my site utilizing the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chrisg.com/killer-flagship-content-free-ebook-to-download/&quot;&gt;flagship content concept&lt;/a&gt; aimed at the category level.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This also brings people into the site  pre-funneled on the topic they were originally interested in and they do not need to go looking through my infinitely long list of categories (ok the long list kind of sucks, but no one is perfect).  The point is you can go into the site and read 12 articles in succession on voice recognition.  or similarly through the other categories.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like using categories in the slug.  The thing is I use multiple categories when I tag an article.  This allows my readers to cross reference topics on my blogs.  Only the first category gets slugged (I think its either alphabetical order or the first one checked).</p>
<p>I have been writing a lot of articles on the same topic and when I categorize them I then use the category url as a link into my blog from other sites.  For example, I have written a dozen or more articles on <a href="http://www.softduit.com/mavenmappersinformation/category/software/voice-recognition/">Voice Recognition</a> and use that category to send people to my site utilizing the <a href="http://www.chrisg.com/killer-flagship-content-free-ebook-to-download/">flagship content concept</a> aimed at the category level.</p>
<p>This also brings people into the site  pre-funneled on the topic they were originally interested in and they do not need to go looking through my infinitely long list of categories (ok the long list kind of sucks, but no one is perfect).  The point is you can go into the site and read 12 articles in succession on voice recognition.  or similarly through the other categories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Dash</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/comment-page-1/#comment-14915</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 17:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2122#comment-14915</guid>
		<description>Gerard is right. I discovered this the bad way. I accidentally blew away my database on a new blog a couple of weekends ago. I fortunately had backups of each post, but I lost a few important comments. My URL structure uses only category and post name. I usually don&#039;t like to use category, but someone suggested it here. When I had rebuilt the database by hand, sans comments, a couple of URLs had changed, since those posts used two  or more categories.

Fortunately, it&#039;s a new blog and only had 8 posts. But imagine if it had hundreds. Of course, had I done a nightly/weekly backup, maybe it wouldn&#039;t be an issue. Still, i&#039;m never using category slugs again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gerard is right. I discovered this the bad way. I accidentally blew away my database on a new blog a couple of weekends ago. I fortunately had backups of each post, but I lost a few important comments. My URL structure uses only category and post name. I usually don&#8217;t like to use category, but someone suggested it here. When I had rebuilt the database by hand, sans comments, a couple of URLs had changed, since those posts used two  or more categories.</p>
<p>Fortunately, it&#8217;s a new blog and only had 8 posts. But imagine if it had hundreds. Of course, had I done a nightly/weekly backup, maybe it wouldn&#8217;t be an issue. Still, i&#8217;m never using category slugs again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard McGarry</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/comment-page-1/#comment-14914</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard McGarry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 16:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2122#comment-14914</guid>
		<description>ifranky - I implemented category slugs on a blog at the start, and it became enormously popular. The problem is, if I change category names or do any sort of category maintenance, it changes the url structures of old posts. The upshot is you have to keep your category structure rigid as hell or you risk breaking stuff - internal and external links.

If I&#039;d known this at the start, I would never have used the categories to form the URL. Bad idea unless you&#039;re prepared to set your categories in stone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ifranky &#8211; I implemented category slugs on a blog at the start, and it became enormously popular. The problem is, if I change category names or do any sort of category maintenance, it changes the url structures of old posts. The upshot is you have to keep your category structure rigid as hell or you risk breaking stuff &#8211; internal and external links.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;d known this at the start, I would never have used the categories to form the URL. Bad idea unless you&#8217;re prepared to set your categories in stone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Dash</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/comment-page-1/#comment-14913</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2122#comment-14913</guid>
		<description>Good points, Brett. I&#039;m going to have a &quot;why deep link&quot; article up at SearchEngineJournal.com - probably tomorrow. As per most of my articles there, it&#039;s technical. I have a variation for this site that&#039;s 80% done, but I have to make sure I don&#039;t overlap too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, Brett. I&#8217;m going to have a &#8220;why deep link&#8221; article up at SearchEngineJournal.com &#8211; probably tomorrow. As per most of my articles there, it&#8217;s technical. I have a variation for this site that&#8217;s 80% done, but I have to make sure I don&#8217;t overlap too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Bumeter</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/comment-page-1/#comment-14912</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Bumeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2122#comment-14912</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I started seeing deep linkage manipulation last fall myself.  It was used by a company that will remain nameless, to hide information as opposed to promoting it.  (ask yourself why someone would want to hide information online if you want to engage in some fun conspiracy theories).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regardless, the technique to hide can be used to illuminate as well, hence I signed up as an Illuminati initiate. (just kidding or am I?).  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Truth be told I agree with you there is a lot of bang for the buck in promotion of deep links.  There&#039;s a lot of &#039;logic&#039; in it from Google&#039;s perspective, because for your average website , not talking blogs here, the front page rarely has the information you are looking for.  The good stuff is on the inside typically.  So a strong deep link is probably where the surfer / reader wants to go anyway.  Therefore, it makes a lot of sense to pay attention to your deep pages and what you are doing with them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I for one am currently orchestrating a lot of movement in this area right now.   . . &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started seeing deep linkage manipulation last fall myself.  It was used by a company that will remain nameless, to hide information as opposed to promoting it.  (ask yourself why someone would want to hide information online if you want to engage in some fun conspiracy theories).</p>
<p>Regardless, the technique to hide can be used to illuminate as well, hence I signed up as an Illuminati initiate. (just kidding or am I?).  </p>
<p>Truth be told I agree with you there is a lot of bang for the buck in promotion of deep links.  There&#8217;s a lot of &#8216;logic&#8217; in it from Google&#8217;s perspective, because for your average website , not talking blogs here, the front page rarely has the information you are looking for.  The good stuff is on the inside typically.  So a strong deep link is probably where the surfer / reader wants to go anyway.  Therefore, it makes a lot of sense to pay attention to your deep pages and what you are doing with them.</p>
<p>I for one am currently orchestrating a lot of movement in this area right now.   . . </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/comment-page-1/#comment-14911</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2122#comment-14911</guid>
		<description>Ok. Forget the &quot;first 20&quot; provision.  Anyone who sends me a PM gets to learn about my effective, yet simple strategy with social voting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok. Forget the &#8220;first 20&#8243; provision.  Anyone who sends me a PM gets to learn about my effective, yet simple strategy with social voting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ifranky</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/comment-page-1/#comment-14910</link>
		<dc:creator>ifranky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2122#comment-14910</guid>
		<description>Awesome analysis Ryan. Especially #1 and #2 (CSS divs).

One thing I often also notice is that people have too many internal links on their home page (or site wide even). This can in my experience lower the amount level of directly inherited domain PR juice. But if applied correctly every permanent link in fe. the sidebar will inherit [domain] PR-1. 
Usually I link on the main page to the articles I really want to pimp out (best of) and most read ones (keep the traffic coming).

Another idea, to strengthen the power of keywords, is to use the category name in the slug. This is much better SEO than to use the date (standard) permalink structure such as the case is with WP. Use in WP &lt;code&gt;/%category%/%postname%/&lt;/code&gt; to obtain that structure. A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.deanlee.cn/wordpress/permalinks-migration-plugin/&quot;&gt;simple plugin&lt;/a&gt; takes care of redirecting your old links to the new structure, and that without losing juice.
Inconvenience with this strategy is that it isn&#039;t too smart to assign entries two or more categories, but isn&#039;t that what we have tags for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome analysis Ryan. Especially #1 and #2 (CSS divs).</p>
<p>One thing I often also notice is that people have too many internal links on their home page (or site wide even). This can in my experience lower the amount level of directly inherited domain PR juice. But if applied correctly every permanent link in fe. the sidebar will inherit [domain] PR-1.<br />
Usually I link on the main page to the articles I really want to pimp out (best of) and most read ones (keep the traffic coming).</p>
<p>Another idea, to strengthen the power of keywords, is to use the category name in the slug. This is much better SEO than to use the date (standard) permalink structure such as the case is with WP. Use in WP <code>/%category%/%postname%/</code> to obtain that structure. A <a href="http://www.deanlee.cn/wordpress/permalinks-migration-plugin/">simple plugin</a> takes care of redirecting your old links to the new structure, and that without losing juice.<br />
Inconvenience with this strategy is that it isn&#8217;t too smart to assign entries two or more categories, but isn&#8217;t that what we have tags for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/comment-page-1/#comment-14909</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2122#comment-14909</guid>
		<description>Try the private message option:
http://performancing.com/privatemsg

I&#039;ve gotten several of these already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try the private message option:<br />
<a href="http://performancing.com/privatemsg" rel="nofollow">http://performancing.com/privatemsg</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve gotten several of these already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Green</title>
		<link>http://performancing.com/5_ways_to_diversify_your_links/comment-page-1/#comment-14908</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://performancing.com/?p=2122#comment-14908</guid>
		<description>Love to write you an email but the contact form doesn&#039;t seem to be working (hangs up) about the social bookmarking &quot;secrets&quot;. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love to write you an email but the contact form doesn&#8217;t seem to be working (hangs up) about the social bookmarking &#8220;secrets&#8221;. <img src='http://performancing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

