Is Snake-oil Damaging Blogging?

It’s a thought that has been running around my head lately but seeing this quote at WorkBoxers really crystallised it:

Below are some quotes I found on the Super Affiliate Cloning Blog from people who seem to be brainwashed by the idea of making money online. It’s damaging their lives and I hate to see it.

Even a year ago people would say to me “blogging? What’s that”, now people ask how they can “tell their boss where to shove it” and become a full time blogger. I think there are some unrealistic expectations being propagated.

We have said over and over that blogging is hard work and while you can make an income if you are in full time employment right now it is probably best to have your blogging as a side project until your blogging revenue is sufficient to pay your bills. Unfortunately it seems a lot of people are jumping in before they even have a blog.

My hope would be more bloggers can make some cash from their efforts when we release Partners, but even then I hope people are realistic about planning their income.

I have no evidence to back this up but I predict that the majority of people who earn a living from blogging make their money out of all their activities combined, it will have to be the rarest and most successful of bloggers who make all their money from one blog. Look at Darren, problogger himself. It’s not problogger.net that earns him his crust, he has a share in a blog network, a blogging course and several of his own blogs.

Snake-oil sales letters are out there making all sorts of promises of instant riches via spammy scripts, guaranteed success plans and SEO-scheme-of-the-week. Do not believe it. If only it was true we would all be rich!

If you are hoping to make a living out of blogging here are some more realistic tips

1. Don’t have any illusions about it being your sole income until you see evidence in your bank account
2. Diversify, do not rely on one blog or one income stream
3. Choose your niches carefully
4. Experiment with formats, layout and article types
5. Analyse your traffic and do more of what works
6. Market yourself and your blog, write killer headlines, linkbait
7. Network network network – a good portion of success comes from who you know
8. Consider a paying gig as well as your own blogs
9. Join a team or a network if you feel you haven’t got all necessary skills but can write
10. Keep at it, the rewards take a while to arrive so it takes stamina

The End of an Institution: Danny Sullivan Leaves Search Engine Watch

Danny Sullivan’s SearchEngineWatch.com is nothiing short of an institution among Search geeks — The news that he’s leaving both the site, and the SES conferences is pretty sad.

Jupiter Media sold SEW to Incisive last year, and apparently they’re too thick to cut Danny a slice of the pie:

I explained these reservations at the very beginning of my relationship with Incisive, that I needed some long-term incentive for helping them continue to grow and strengthen the site and conferences. After over a year of talks, that’s failed to materialize. As a result, I’m departing.

Dumbarses.

Good luck Danny, it’ll be interesting to see what comes next…

powered by performancing firefox

How Plone Websites are being Used to Spam Blogs

There’s an interesting, destructive little exploit being used to spam Performancing.com and doubless many other blogs at the moment. It took a small amount of investigation but was fairly easy to work out, and rather than sit on the info and hope it will go away, I’ll show you how it’s done, so that Plone might work to fix this problem. At least they could alert their users to the risks.

How it Works

1. Find sites built with Plone.

2. Join those sites, and create a page like this one. Notice that it redirects to Performancing.com?

You can make it do that by putting code like this in the body:

Why It Works

What happens is, Google follows the link from your spam on sites like this one but does not redirect as Googlebot doesn’t follow Javascript redirects. As you’ve chosen Plone sites with good reputation and PageRank, they rank for the terms you use in your link text, and unsuspecting Google users click the linksthey find in Search results, and are redirected to your scummy pharma affiliate link.

No need for a real website of your own, this is Parasite SEO kids.

Ordinarily I’d not waste time with it, but if it starts affecting my sites, i get kind of interested in seeing it stop you know?

powered by performancing firefox

Podtech Crashes My Firefox

I was so keen to hear this video interview with Om Malik that Scoble was promoting that I let the damn thing crash Firefox twice this morning.

Im on ubuntu, FF 1.5.0.5 with no special tweaks. You’d think they’d test this stuff huh?

powered by performancing firefox

5 + 1 Tips Towards Being An Efficient And Successful Biz-Blogger

A number of bloggers have made a variety of informative comments recently about how they’re blogging for pay. Go visit the Exchange blog for a view of some good advice. Here are a few tips of my own in the form of a point list. Keep in mind that I’m using the term biz-blogger in the sense that you are blogging for someone else for pay, be it online publishers or companies with a blog, not necessarily in the sense that you are blogging about business topics.

(1) Choose a few (niche) topics. The amount of effort that it takes to really learn one topic is a lot more than you might think. Even when you are an expert at something, there are probably new things to learn all the time. If you blog about too many topics simultaneously, you run the risk of producing sub-par work. That’s what happened to me on my own blogs. Now, I try to focus most of the weekdays on client blogs, and spend the weekends for my own blogs – but at a reduced number. If I have blogs that overlap that of clients’, in terms of topics, I might publish to those on weekdays as well, but I limit myself to one long article or several short posts.

(2) Be realistic. A professional writer of any flavour must be able to learn new topics on the fly. This is especially true for professional biz-bloggers. But as per point #1 above, there’s only so much time in a day to learn AND write. I’ve limited myself to 5-6 topics that I blog about daily. I’m not including one-off writing projects, most of which I can do on weekends. Though accepting this many topics means putting in 10 hours or more per day. (As I get more efficient on a topic, I find myself relaxing and actually spending a couple of hours watching TV without guilt.) If you are working at a daytime (or nighttime) job as well, don’t try to take on more than one or two topics all at once – unless you plan to devote your entire weekend to blogging. I’m not a vacation person, preferring instead to meditate, but do consider taking a vacation from blogging.

(3) Leverage your time. If you are focusing, try to write at least three posts per day, Mon-Fri, on a given topic. It seems to be a magic minimum number for improving the ranking of blog over time (other factors are involved, of course). Unless I have some personal reason for doing so, I generally won’t accept less than 5 posts per week on new contracts. However, some clients may want less, and you might choose to accept.

My suggestion, if you have the time, is to write the remaining quota of posts for your own related blog. That is, if you get a contract for 5 posts/ week, write 15 and post the excess on your own blog. Why not leverage the time you already spend on research for yourself? It might eventually lead to additional work with the same client, or for someone else.

Even though this is point #3, for me, it’s the most important point for leveraging your research. Doing it for yourself, without pressure, helps prep you for the time when you might get a lot of work. You’ll already know how much you can handle. It’s helped me to be able to handle 12-20 posts per day (mix of long, medium, and short), on weekdays – for both myself and clients.

If you can build yourself up to a point where you’re writing 10 posts per day on one-three topics, at $5/post and up, that’s at least $50/day. (Brett Burn pointed out something similar, in response to a post on Tribal Trends in Professional Blogging that Markus wrote.) That’s not a lot of money, not enough to live on. But the more you leverage your research, the less total time you’ll spend each day writing each post. I generally find that I may spend, say, 1-3 hours per day reading on one topic, then about 10-20 minutes per post (for short and medium length), including organic SEO work. So why not spend a bit more time writing a few more posts? Obviously, it’s not possible for longer pieces, which can take me 1-3 hours to write and polish. However, I can write the longer piece for the client and a couple of short pieces for my own blog(s).

Leverage your time. The general rule of thumb is that, if you can write one or two more posts in less than an hour, with no further research, then you increase average hourly earnings for that day.

(By the way, go have a look at how Brett’s structured his member profile, so that clients looking for bloggers will get a sense of his areas of expertise.)

(4) Learn to know when you have too much work. If you’re reliable and do good work, you may soon find yourself being asked to accept more work than you can handle. Don’t be afraid to say “no” to an opportunity. If you don’t have time, you don’t have time. Be polite and turn it down, or suggest another blogger that you trust. It’s better than saying yes and not delivering on time. If you have family or other commitments, they are always far more important than over-working yourself. Don’t quit the working world to work for yourself, and then end up doing the same thing at home.

(5) Share your bounty. Consider brokering work you can’t handle yourself. This might work if you have a lot of clients who need one-off pieces, and you know reliable writers who don’t have the same channels to contact clients. However, for blogs specifically, this is probably pretty rare right now. I can see how brokering for freelance writing may be successful – especially if you decide to run a quality article bank. But freelance blogging probably isn’t yet lucrative enough. (Also, if content has to be timely, it’s unlikely to be evergreen – which means it probably won’t pay well enough to broker.) Don’t forget that if you are brokering, you are responsible for quality, so …

(6) Add value to your brokering. If you build your reputation to the point that you can broker work, and have reliable writers that won’t let you down, add something to the process that gives value to everyone. For example, if you are good at copyediting and/or organic SEO, you could broker work to junior bloggers who submit their writing to you. You then apply your magic to their work, and submit the finished work to the client. Everybody wins in this process: happy client, junior bloggers who get to improve their skills, and yourself, who gets to spend time more efficiently.

Of course, this scenario only succeeds if you know more about the broad topic in question than your junior bloggers. You could also let them work up their chops on your blog(s), before writing for clients, in case you don’t have a lot of time to edit. This could be the beginning of a team blogging effort, like Chris Garrett wrote about previously.

The list above should hopefully give you some tips towards becoming an efficient and successful biz-blogger on a long-term basis. Build your reputation as a reliable resource for anyone publishing website/ weblog content, and the work should follow, with a bit of diligent searching on your own. Finally: If you’re proud of your work, ask your clients for references for when you approach other clients.

Please feel free to add your tips, or even disagree with mine – provided you explain why

Bloggers versus Corporates, Goliath versus Goliath?

There are many examples of people pissing off bloggers and the company regretting it. When bloggers are riled there is usually swift and painful retribution. In some cases though it would be a far smarter move to ignore the blogger and move on, sometimes reacting is just pouring fuel on the fire.

The famous example of “ignore it and it might go away” going wrong is of course the Kryptonite Lock debacle. Remember that? The super-secure bike lock … that could be unlocked using a bic pen. In that case ignoring the blogger strategy heavily backfired. Whoah did that backfire. The main hurt came from big media like the New York Times, that is when ordinary Joseph and Josephine Public got to hear about the story but a bit better handling at the start might have headed off the worst of it.

Now a case where the company should have really left well alone. I just read via Business Blog Consulting
 about Eric D. Snider and his Paramount bust up. Apparently he tore into press junkets and Paramount responded by not only booting him off their junket list but also banning him from press screenings and also got their publicists to ban him from screenings from other studios. For a start a tad over-dramatic response, but also probably unnecessary.

In the first example there was clearly something A) very very wrong and B) very very newsworthy. It ticks the boxes for how to make an idea viral; it is easy to understand, it’s interesting and remarkable, easy to spread, easy to remember and passing along provides a benefit (ie. “your $50 lock is practically useless” “geez I didn’t know that, thanks friend!”). 

The Paramount case didn’t meet the viral criteria until Paramount got over zealous in their retaliation. Originally the story was pretty ho-hum, I mean who isn’t already cynical about film reviews and their junkets? Even if you weren’t, people aren’t going to stop going to films just because some journo got bribed to make happy-quotes, right? But a zero-story becomes a story when it becomes “film company over-reacts and tries squashing poor little film critic” or somesuch.

So what is the litmus test for this kind of thing? Here are the main pain points as far as I see it:

1. First consideration has to be is there any validity to the story?
2. Regardless of validity, how likely are people to believe it (or want to believe it)?
3. Is it interesting?
4. How damaging will it be if not nipped in the bud?
5. How viral could it be?
6. How much is it going to cost in time and money to get the story “corrected”?

In the first story it was obviously valid, people definitely believed it but after the non-reaction of the company, really wanted to believe it too. The product was a joke and the company did nothing in the early days to correct it and this ended up really damaging the company. It was massively viral and who knows what the final price tag was. Our second story, validity … well I will let you decide, but before they waded in it fell on the “interesting” and “viral” tests. Originally it was about as viral as the shock that some politicians are corrupt. No, really? Zzzz.

So far we have only looked at the story from the company point of view but this stuff is pure gold for the blogger.

If you hit on a story that meets all the viral criteria and pain points then you ought to have a real winner on your hands

• A campaign for people to get behind
• You become the hero
• Masses of traffic
• An ever-green story that will last and last
• 15mins of fame – TV, Radio, Print mentions
• And possibly fight injustice or fix a faulty product

So get looking out for stories you could break. Of course I wouldn’t recommend provoking the company in question into over-reacting with their response to make your story better …

Off the Beaten Web2.0 Track

Matt Cutts is declaring today “Break out of your rut and play with a Web 2.0 start-up” day. There are a few interesting companies on the list, but none moreso than….. wait for it…..

So at the risk of inviting a self promo hell thread, lets join in and list a few lesser known web2.0 companies worth a look..

powered by performancing firefox

Feeds That Matter

Here’s an interesting tagcloud of “Feeds that Matter” produced by these guys, courtesy of this guy, which is based upon public bloglines subscriptions for various categories. There’s a PDF on that link describing their research, but I was bored before I’d even opened it.

The tagcloud is pretty cool though, and a cursory glance tells me it’s worth further investigation..

powered by performancing firefox

Interesting Challenge for API Programmers

This post by Chopianissima caught my attention today. I think there’s an opportunity for some enterprising programmer to make a big splash by creating a widget like this with the Metrics API.

And what’s more, Chris is right (first comment), it IS easy to do.

powered by performancing firefox

Is Community Voting on Blogging Jobs a Good or Bad Feature?

As part of the Beta of Performancing Exchange, our free classifieds style job and blogs board, we used an AJAX voting mechanism so that members could rate jobs.

We’ve already had a couple of jobs voted to the homepage by the community, but there were negative comments about the value of a voting system for job offers at the beginning, and i’d like to open some discussion on it’s value.

Personally I like it. A well written, interesting job offer can make it to the Performancing homepage without need for me, chris, or any other admin to decide on it’s worth — the community decides (in fact, i’d like to do this for all posts, including forum/blog/etc..).

It also provides a way for bloggers looking for job to quickly scan and discard those offers with poor scores.

What we need now, is to hear what you think, and whether you like or dislike it and why — and whether we should move the system out onto the rest of the site?

powered by performancing firefox